Council archive · source document
08/1193 - Operational Works - Access, Car Parking [As Published] · 142008.1193
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008
AREA
ASSOCIATED WITH RECONFIGURING A LOT; RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A WILD RIVER
f<-
42
ify of the proposed operational work associated with reconfiguring a lot and the reconfiguration is also assessable?
No-Gowos3 [J Yes
if yes, is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
oO No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the local goverment,
0 Yes
It yes, is the proposed operational work for residential, commercial or industrial purposes outside a designated urban area,
as defined by the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
oO No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the local government.
oO Yes (Complete Form 1, Part E} The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the focal govemmeni, and subject to the
declaration for the relevant wild river area, assessment by the focal govemment is required for the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2005.
PUNE 1p a,
COMA BRIE
we
VEGETATION CLEARING; KOALA CONSERVATION; WILD RIVER AREA
4.3
Is Any of the proposed operational work for the clearing of native vegetation to which the Vegetation Management Act 1999 applies?
No-Gotoasa [1] Yes
If yes, is the proposed clearing assessable (i.e. not an exception) under schedule 8, part 1, table 4 of the IPA?
LINo-Gowass (Cy) Yes
” Ityes, is the proposed vegetation clearing a relevant purpose under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, section 22A
for one or more of the following?
(i) Approject declared to be a significant project under the State Development and Public Works [_]No [] Yes
Organisation Act 1971, section 26
(ii) Necessary to control non-native plants or declared pest LINo (Yes
(iii) To ensure public safety ; CINo [1] Yes
{iv) For establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or vehicle track, or for constructing [JNo [_] Yes
necessary built infrastructure, if there is no suitable alternative site for the fence, firebreak,
road, track or infrastructure
{v) Anatural and ordinary consequence of other assessable development for which a No [Yes
development approval as defined under the Planning Act was given, or a development !
application as defined under the Planning Act was made, before 16 May 2003
“(vi) For fodder harvesting ‘CUNo :(] Yes
“(vil). For thinning . CINo ‘ClYes
(viii) For clearing of encroachment CINo Oo Yes .
(ix) For an extractive industry LJ No (7 Yes
(x) For clearing regrowth on leases issued under the Land Act 1994 tor agriculture or grazing CNo ‘(} Yes
purposes
{xi) For clearing regrowth on freehold land, or indigenous land, in a wild river high preservation [[}No ((] Yes
area,
If no to alll (i} ~ (xi) above - The clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the application.
If yes to any one of (i) ~ (xi) above, is the proposed clearing associated with a material change of use or reconfiguring a
lot for which referral is required in relation to clearing vegetation (ie. did you answer Yes’ to all questions in either 02.1.4 or Q 3.3)?
1 Yes - Goto. 04.4
oO No — Answer (a) {b} and (c) on the next page of this Checklist
Page 29
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1193 - Operational Works - Access, Car Parking [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.