Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

RFI - Email from RPEQ Structural Engineer

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

If required, we can investigate alternative retention systems (e.g. sheet piling) that may allow for
selective removal or modification of structural elements within the setback zone. However, It should be
noted that the currently proposed CFA (continuous flight auger) piled solution represents a premium
construction methodology, specifically selected to minimise ground vibration and reduce the risk of
damage to adjoining structures. While sheet piling may achieve a reduced structural footprint within the
setback, it inherently requires vibratory or impact-driven installation methods, which introduce a higher
risk of ground disturbance and potential impacts to adjacent properties.




Regards,



Tom Harrington




    (07) 5455 5604


    1/11 Project Avenue, Noosaville, QLD, 4566


    PO Box 1661, Noosa Heads, QLD, 4567


    scg-engineers.com        [email protected]
Log in to download the original file

RFI - Email from RPEQ Structural Engineer.pdf · 202 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.