Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

planning report 22 lorikeet - draft · MCU25/0146

of 12

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

5.0 State assessment and other matters
5.1 State interests
5.1.1 Matters established in the Planning Regulation

Nil

5.1.2 State Planning Policy

The SPP includes assessment benchmarks that may be applicable where a local government
planning scheme does not adequately reflect the SPP. The Noosa Plan 2020 appropriately
integrates all SPP provisions, except for Natural Hazards, risk and resilience – coastal hazards – in
part. The site is within an Erosion prone area but not within a Coastal management district and
therefore no further assessment is required.



6.0 Conclusion
This application seeks a Development Permit a Material Change of Use for a Dwelling House
(Coastal Protection Overlay) situated at 22 Lorikeet Drive, Peregian Beach. The proposed
development is code assessable and meets the relevant Acceptable and Performance Outcomes.

The Planning Act 2016 prescribes that a code assessment must be carried out only—

         (a)   against the assessment benchmarks in a categorising instrument for the development (The Noosa Plan 2020); and

         (b) having regard to any matters prescribed by regulation.

Council, after carrying out the assessment—

         (a) must decide to approve the application to the extent the development complies with all of the assessment benchmarks for
         the development; and

         (b) may decide to approve the application even if the development does not comply with some of the assessment benchmarks;
         and

         Examples—
                 1           An assessment manager may approve an application for development that does not comply with some of
                             the benchmarks if the decision resolves a conflict between the benchmarks.

                   2         An assessment manager may approve an application for development that does not comply with some of
                             the benchmarks if the decision resolves a conflict between the benchmarks and a referral agency’s
                             response.

         (c) may impose development conditions on an approval; and

         (d) may, to the extent the development does not comply with some or all the assessment benchmarks, decide to refuse the
         application only if compliance cannot be achieved by imposing development conditions.

         Example of a development condition—
                            a development condition that affects the way the development is carried out, or the management of uses
                            or works that are the natural and ordinary consequence of the development, but does not have the effect
                            of changing the type of development applied for


The assessment finds the development complies with all Acceptable and Performance Outcomes of
the applicable codes. The Assessment Manager’s favourable consideration of the above
development application is therefore recommended.




                                                                                                                    Page 12 of 12

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

planning report 22 lorikeet - draft.pdf · 2.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.