Original source · versioned page text
2018-07-06 SM - Attachment 1 to Item 5 - Level of Service Catalogue
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Disaster Response
[Activities include providing equipment and resources to respond to issues related to community assets to ensure
community safety and protection of property]
Reactive work Field resources responding to issues related to As required
community assets (road flooding; trees down, block
drains; support for fire management etc.)
Disaster Recovery
[Activities may include convening the Disaster Recovery Group, conducting needs analysis, operational and action
planning, capturing details of Council asset damage and estimates of costs, dealing with public health and bulk waste
disposal requirements, submitting a claim for financial assistance from other levels of government etc.]
Reactive work Convene Disaster Recovery Group As required
Co-ordinate / implement actions for recovery As required
Capture details of asset damage, estimated costs to As required
rectify
NDRRA application for funding As required
NDRRA acquittal As required
SERVICE DELIVERY MODEL
This is an internally managed and delivered service with close liaison with multiple agencies.
KEY SERVICE METRICS
1
Measure Metric Benchmark Comparison
Annual assessment of the Local Disaster Management TBA All Qld LGAs
Plan against the Emergency Management Assurance
Framework.
Score = or > Well Placed (6-8 stars)
Capacity to respond to disaster events is maintained so TBA Cat. 3 Qld local governments
that Residual Risks identified in Local Disaster
Management Plan do not increase.
Events exceeding capacity are limited to those identified
in the Plan (Page 46).
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Service Indicator Performance Measure Methodology
Disaster Management Disaster TBA - Qld Disaster Resilience Score from Qld Strategy for Disaster
Resilience Indicators are currently under Resilience to measure progress in
development by the State. developing increased levels of
disaster resilience.
Disaster Management Satisfaction Noosa community satisfaction Community satisfaction mean
mean rating score compared performance rating from the LGAQ
to the State mean rating score 2017 Community Satisfaction
(out of optimum rating of 5). Tracking Survey for Provincial areas
for:
NSC mean State mean
rating (2017) rating (2017) Theme: Managing the Shire
3.90 Function not Function: Disaster Management
included in
State tracking
1
Service metrics are under development at State level – may not be available until late 2018.
Page 45
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.