Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 3 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Coastal Erosion Options
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
5.2. Sensitivities
Some key assumptions in the analysis, identified through sensitivity analysis are material to the
findings.These assumptions, set out in Table 6, should be subject to further investigation prior to
implementing any project option. Further sensitivity analysis of the discount rate and other
assumptions used in the analysis is provided in Appendix C.
Table 6 Sensitivities
Assumption Confidence Sensitivity Description
The costs included in the analysis do not fully
reflect the risk to undertaking this option including:
Cost of dune • potential viability of local sand sources
Medium High
augmentation
• costs of transportation
• potential for no sand to be available
Rock There are also implementation cost uncertainties
availability stemming from a feasible rock supply and build
and Medium High and cost times. For example, longer haulage times
construction given limited local supply would imply greater
of seawall costs.
The analysis does not currently account for the
impact of more frequent large storms events
occurring after each augmentation. Modelling of
smaller, more frequent events and the effect this
Storm events Low High
may have should also be considered further. This
could significantly change the years in which
damage would occur, or immediately remove any
benefits of dune augmentation being undertaken.
It is difficult to fully value the benefit of new open
space recreational areas particularly given the
other recreational spaces such as beaches and
Value of new
Low High reserves already in close proximity. Community
parks
consultation could provide further insights on the
associated benefits of increasing public open
space.
The presence of the seawall is expected to lead to
reductions in the beach width and thereby reduce
recreational values, non-use values (including
ecological) and visual amenity. However, at the
Changes in
Low High preliminary stage there is limited confidence on the
beach width
timing or speed of these effects. Based on real
world evidence, the analysis currently assumes
that the beach is completely eroded up to the
seawall.
AITHER | Final Report 23
Noosa Shire Council – Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.