Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 3 - Cost Benefit Analysis for Coastal Erosion Options
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
5.3. Summary Eastern Beaches For the Eastern Beaches, the most socio-economically feasible adaptation option is dune management and dune augmentation, such as assessed through option 3. It is also likely that planning restrictions (i.e. option 7) may deliver net economic benefits. Whilst option 3 appears to be the most beneficial option in this analysis, it is dependent upon sufficient sand availability to continue to undertake dune augmentation until 2100. It also depends on continued funding and political buy-in for this augmentation to be undertaken every 5 years. The analysis has also not been able to account for the impact of storm events which may also reduce the benefits from dune augmentation or require more frequent interventions at an increased cost. Option 7, whilst delivering lower net benefits than option 3 under this analysis, is lower risk. There are limited additional costs associated with changes to the planning, and no requirements for continued interventions and funding over time. Implementing planning restrictions such as those in option 7, alongside dune augmentation in viable locations is likely to deliver socio-economic benefits to the community and reduce risks. Further investigation into the full costs of dune augmentation and detailed land use planning provisions should therefore be undertaken. Based on this analysis it is unlikely that benefits of acquisitions (such as under options 5 and 6) will outweigh the costs in the Eastern Beaches area. It is also highly unlikely that development of seawalls (option 4) is feasible or appropriate in these locations. In general, the majority of the benefits of all options accrue to a small number of people in the community who currently own beachfront properties. The equity implications of the wider community funding any actions that provide protection for these private properties through the Council should be carefully considered. Teewah In Teewah there are limited benefits from undertaking any type of adaptation activity, as the majority of properties are not affected until 2100. Acquisition of a very limited number of properties may be the most appropriate option in this location. However, the value of this is dependent on the public value of additional open space, particularly in the context of existing adjacent land uses of a similar type. This should be tested through community consultation and preferably an economic analysis of the community’s willingness to pay. AITHER | Final Report 24 Noosa Shire Council – Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.