Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0056 Response to SARA - Consulting Report

of 321

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (24.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Original PDF page 87, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
          3.2        SPEL Puraceptor Sizing
          The sizing of the SPEL Puraceptor is based on the Rational Method that is common practice among
          hydrologists to determine the amount of runoff as a result of rainfall events. The geographical location of
          the site by means of its latitude and longitude figures is used along with the Intensity-Frequency-Duration
          (IFD) data provided by the Bureau of Meteorology to determine the amount of Rainfall Intensity relevant to
          the duration of time of concentration of the catchment area and 20 Years ARI (Annual Recurrence Interval).


          3.3        Performance Analysis
          SPEL Puraceptor devices have undergone rigorous and comprehensive testing for total suspended solids,
          heavy metals and hydrocarbons. The reduction values listed within are from flow tests conducted by the
          University of South Australia Hydraulics Research Laboratory (UniSA) and at HR Wallingford United
          Kingdom.

          3.3.1      University of South Australia Testing – Oil & TPH
          Tests were performed at the UNISA Hydraulics Research facility and at HR Wallingford UK with the device
          in flow mode, with the following results. Test methodology was done to European Standard BS EN 85.1
          Section 8.3.


          The oily water mix compiled by the UniSA was deliberately made to replicate service station runoff. This
          field testing illustrates that for an inflow of 5699 mg/l (5% over test target level of 5000 mg/l), which was
          expected to have deleterious effects on the performance of the unit, the SPEL Puraceptor was able to treat
          the runoff to a TPH concentration complying with the most stringent standards. This, points up the
          conservative and rigorous character of the testing conducted by UniSA. As such, the Puraceptor is
          considered to qualify as a Class 1 light liquid separator in accordance with EN 858-1. Moreover it is
          worthwhile to note Environmental Authorities worldwide regard less than 10 ppm as being the benchmark
          for no visible trace or sheen. Table 2.1 shows that discharge water quality reduction remains constant at
          <0.1ppm of TPH translating to `no visible trace` from a constant inflow concentration of 5,000ppm. The
          detail of the field study can be reviewed in Appendix 3.


          The Hydrocarbon mix used for the University of South Australia testing program was deliberately
          formulated to replicate the carbon fraction breakdown that we see in the field on service stations all over
          Australia. The NATA detection instruments detect all forms of hydrocarbon as in free phase, emulisified
          and dissolved fractions. The C6 – C9 fraction represents the BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and
          Xylene) constituent of the mix.

          Table 2.1- Reduction of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons



                                   Inflow               Outlet Samples TPH Fraction Concentrations     Calculated
          Hydrocarbon
                           EQL*    Concentration                                                       Mean
          Fraction
                                   (Total 5699.0)                                                      Concentration
                                                        1         2       3         4        5


          C6-C9            0.02    0.15                 <0.02     <0.02   <0.02     <0.02    <0.02     <0.02


          C10-C14          0.04    125.43               <0.04     <0.04   <0.04     <0.04    <0.04     <0.04


          C15-C28          0.10    5570.62              <0.1      0.162   <0.1      <0.1     <0.1      < 0.032




HEAD OFFICE                  POSTAL                            EMAIL                         ABN                          spel.com.au
100 Silverwater Road         PO BOX 7138                       [email protected]             83 151 832 629
Silverwater NSW 2128         Silverwater NSW 2128
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0056 Response to SARA - Consulting Report.pdf · 24.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.