Council archive · source document
Geotech Report · OPW26/0094
Project No. PG-10899 Page | 4 November 2023 Ref: PG-10899, 2023-10-16, GR VER 1 DD Sunnyside CD Sunnyside Pty Ltd – Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residence, 30 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL MODEL The subsurface profile encountered in borehole BH01 generally consisted of a surficial concrete layer associated with the driveway, overlying very loose to loose sand fill to a depth of 2.3m, overlying natural sands that were generally medium dense to dense, becoming indurated at a depth of 6.6m, and continued to the termination of borehole BH01 of 9.0m. In HA02, loose silty sand fill was encountered to a depth of 0.6m, overlying loose sand fill to the termination depth of 1.0m. Table 1 presents a summary of the encountered subsurface profile. Detailed borehole record sheets are appended to this report. TABLE 1 SUBSURFACE PROFILE SUMMARY NATURAL SAND BH No. FILL BH TD Dense to Very Dense Medium Dense to Dense (Indurated) BH01 0.0-2.3 2.3-6.6 6.6-TD 9.0 BH02 0.0-TD NE NE 1.0 Notes: 1. All depths in metres below ground level at time of investigation. 2. NE - Not Encountered; TD - Termination Depth. 5.0 GROUNDWATER Groundwater was noted in borehole BH01 at a depth of 2.8m at the time of drilling. Water levels can be expected to similar to the tidal levels of the neighbouring canal and may vary with seasonal and climatic conditions. Typically the groundwater levels in the area are encountered at levels of approximately RL 0.5m to RL 1.0m. Fluctuations of +/- 0.5m are typically noted in the area. Increases in the groundwater levels often occur following significant rainfall events (floods) with the groundwater levels to as much as RL 1.5m to RL 2.0m being noted in the area. 6.0 POTENTIAL GROUND SURFACE MOVEMENTS On the basis of the field testing results, and the depth of fill encountered, the site must be classified Class P, in accordance with AS 2870-2011, by definition. This does not necessarily mean the site is a problem, just that it is excluded from other classifications. From a reactivity perspective, the investigation and laboratory test results indicate that the development site would be classified Class ‘S’, slightly reactive, in
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Geotech Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.8 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.