Council archive · source document
07/0521 - Response to further information request [As Published] · 132007.521
3. Compliance and justification of how the proposal meets Specific Outcome 17 of the Natural Resources Overlay Code are as follows : SPECIFIC OUTCOMES [ PROBABLE SOLUTIONS 13.48 AREAS IN A COASTAL PROTECTION PRECINCT Coastal Protection Precinct and Erosion Prone Areas-Eastern Beaches Locality 017 The siting and design of development and materials used within the Coastal Protection Precinct,as identified on the Natural Resources Overlay Maps, do not cause any significant adverse impacts on the coastal resources of the location nor Interrupt the natural cycles of erosion and accretion of foreshore areas and beaches $17.1 Buildings and other structures including swimming pools, retaining walls and landscaped terraces, but excluding cantilevered decks that are uncovered and unenclosed- a) do not extend seaward of the coastal building line: or b) where a coastal building line does not exist on properties fronting the beachfront or reserve adjoining the beachfront-are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary of the site; The proposed rear ( beachside, eastern ) house wall Is set back from the seaward boundary, a minimum of 6m ( southern wing ), and up to a maximum of 14 metres ( northern wing ). The proposed swimming pool Is indicated to be within 1 metre from the seaward boundary. JUSTIFICATION : - the pool does not cause a significant Impact - with 5.0 x 2.7metres within the required 6 metre setback, the pool has a small, narrow footprint - witha ‘wet edge’ along the above dimensions, rather than a continuous pool deck, the pool is considered as an integral, and not dominant, part of the landscape ( refer accompanying drawing no. SD10 ) AND $137.2 Cantilevered decks that are uncovered and unenclosed located seaward of the coastal building tine- a) do not extend seaward of the average of the outermost seaward projection of buildings on directly adjoining properties; and b) are a maximum depth of 3m; c} are setback a minimum of 6m from the seaward boundary of the site; AND a
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/0521 - Response to further information request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 828 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.