Request to extend relevant period - 142007.2555.04

.....   ..
         ~
         ~            INNOVATIVE
                      PLANNING
        ~             SOLUTIONS


           Were a preliminary approval application for Operational Works to be re-made at today’s

           date such an application would:



           (a) Not change the level of assessment        -
                                                             the previous OPW    application was code

               assessable and an application lodged with Council at today’s date would remain code

               assessable.



           (b) Not have any bearing on the infrastructure charges payable for the development as

               these are determined by the higher order MCU approval.



           (c) Would not require modifications to the approved works as engineering standards have

               not changed dramatically since the approval of the Operational Works application.




            (b)the community’s current awareness of the development approval; and


            Community awareness is not a relevant consideration as the original OPW application was

            code assessable and there was no opportunity for community involvement or comment.



            (c) whether, if the request were refused-

            (i) further rights to make a submission may be available for a further development

            application; and
                                                                                                               I
            (ii) the likely extent to which those rights may be exercised; and                                 I
                                                                                                           ..




            The original Preliminary Approval application for Operational Works was code assessable

            and would remain code assessable if re-Iodged. As such there would be no opportunity

            for a submitter to pass comment in respect of the application.


                                                                                                     -

            (d)the views of any concurrence agency far the approval given under section 385.                   I
                                                                                                     -----.J



            There were no concurrence agencies for the original development application and as such

            this consideration is not relevant to the assessment of this request.



           !Summation                         :::


                                                                                    P: 0754431444
                                                                                    E: [email protected]
                                                                                    Suite 5, 156-158 Alexandra Parade
        Page 3 of4                                                                  Alexandra Headland Q 4572
                                                                                    PO Box 1043 Maroochydore Q 4558
                                                                                    townplanningsunshinecoast.com.au