Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

Response to Noosa Council Information Request · RAL20/0027

of 11

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 Page 2
Item 2: Demonstrate how the proposed reconfiguration complies with the relevant provisions within
the Noosa Plan which seek to protect the ecological values and ecological character of the site and
area.

Applicant’s Response to Item 2: No specific provisions have been detailed and therefore it is difficult
to provide an appropriate response to the item. The site is not mapped as containing any significant
vegetation (Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay).


Item 3: Provide a response which demonstrates how the creation of a new lot within an erosion prone
area, which will be subject to vegetation removal and future development, accords with the requirements
of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code and the Reconfiguring a Lot Code

Applicant’s Response to Item 3: A preliminary review of the proposal against the Coastal Protection
and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code and the Reconfiguring a Lot Code is provided in the tables below:

Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code
 Performance Outcomes                         Acceptable Outcomes               Proposal

 PO1                                          No acceptable outcome provided.   Site has a substantial buffer to the
 Development       allows    for   natural                                      frontal dune system and coastline.
 fluctuations of the coast and foreshores
 to occur, including allowance of climate
 change.
 PO2                                          No acceptable outcome provided.   Proposed new lot will not impact
 Development is located, designed and                                           existing frontal dune system and will be
 constructed to:                                                                in line with existing development to the
                                                                                north of the site. The proposed lot
 a) maintain dune crest heights and                                             maintains existing buffers to the
    minimise and mitigate the risk to                                           surrounding area.
    development from wave
    overtopping and storm tide
    inundation; and
 b) maintain or enhance coastal
    ecosystems and natural features
    such as coastal creeks and marine
    plants including mangroves, salt
    marshes and coastal wetlands, to
    assist in protecting and buffering
    communities and infrastructure
    from sea-level rise and coastal
    inundation impacts.

 PO3                                          No acceptable outcome provided.   No coastal building line on site.
 Where a coastal building line exists on
 a lot, all buildings, structures and
 retaining walls do not extend seaward
 of the coastal building line for the site,
 other than—

 a) uncovered and unenclosed
    cantilevered balconies that do not
    extend greater than 3 metres
    seaward of the
    coastal building line; and
 b) are setback a minimum of 6
    metres from the seaward boundary
    (see Figure 8.2.4.4).

  Editor's Note—State
  Coastal building lines are identified on
  the Coastal Protection Overlay Maps.
  State coastal building lines are
  declared under the Coastal Protection
  and Management Act 1995.
 PO4                                          No acceptable outcome provided.   Proposed lot has an average length of
 Where a coastal building line does not                                         41 metres which is more than sufficient
 exist on a lot fronting the beachfront or                                      to cater for a dwelling and required
 a reserve adjoining the beachfront, new                                        setbacks.
 buildings and structures are setback no
 less than 6 metres from the seaward
 boundary of the site.


[OCR of page images]
@ Page 2

Item 2: Demonstrate how the proposed reconfiguration complies with the relevant provisions within
the Noosa Plan which seek to protect the ecological values and ecological character of the site and
area.

Applicant’s Response to Item 2: No specific provisions have been detailed and therefore it is difficult
to provide an appropriate response to the item. The site is not mapped as containing any significant
vegetation (Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Overlay).

Item 3: Provide a response which demonstrates how the creation of a new lot within an erosion prone
area, which will be subject to vegetation removal and future development, accords with the requirements
of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code and the Reconfiguring a Lot Code

Applicant’s Response to Item 3: A preliminary review of the proposal against the Coastal Protection

and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code and the Reconfiguring a Lot Code is provided in the tables below:

Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code

 

 

fluctuations of the coast and foreshores
to occur, including allowance of climate
change.

Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Proposal
PO1 No acceptable outcome provided. Site has a substantial buffer to the
Development allows for natural frontal dune system and coastline.

 

PO2
Development is located, designed and
constructed to:

a) maintain dune crest heights and
minimise and mitigate the risk to
development from wave
overtopping and storm tide
inundation; and

6) maintain or enhance coastal
ecosystems and natural features
such as coastal creeks and marine
plants including mangroves, salt
marshes and coastal wetlands, to
assist in protecting and buffering
communities and infrastructure
from sea-level rise and coastal
inundation impacts.

No acceptable outcome provided.

Proposed new lot will not impact
existing frontal dune system and will be
in line with existing development to the
north of the site. The proposed lot
maintains existing buffers to the
surrounding area.

 

PO3

Where a coastal building line exists on
a lot, all buildings, structures and
retaining walls do not extend seaward
of the coastal building line for the site,
other than—

a) uncovered and unenclosed
cantilevered balconies that do not
extend greater than 3 metres
seaward of the
coastal building line; and

b) are setback a minimum of 6
metres from the seaward boundary
(see Figure 8.2.4.4).

Editor's Note—State

Coastal building lines are identified on
the Coastal Protection Overlay Maps.
State coastal building lines are
declared under the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.

No acceptable outcome provided.

No coastal building line on site.

 

PO4

Where a coastal building line does not
exist on a lot fronting the beachfront or
a reserve adjoining the beachfront, new
buildings and structures are setback no
less than 6 metres from the seaward
boundary of the site.

 

 

No acceptable outcome provided.

 

Proposed lot has an average length of
41 metres which is more than sufficient
to cater for a dwelling and required
setbacks.

 

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
586 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to Noosa Council Information Request.pdf · 586 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.