2021-10-18 General Committee Meeting Minutes

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                                              18 OCTOBER 2021


                b.   The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity
                     enjoyed by residents given resident’s reasonable expectations for the area.
         5.     The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor
                Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and
                Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely
                parking demands on site.
         6.     There is no need for additional Short term accommodation in the area.
         7.     The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO20(b) of the Medium
                Density Residential Zone Code as there is the potential to overlook the private
                open space of neighbouring properties from the rear balcony and unreasonably
                impact on the amenity of those residents.
    B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                          Carried unanimously.



    5    MCU17/0046.03 – APPLICATION FOR AN OTHER CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT
         APPROVAL FOR MULTIPLE HOUSING TYPE 2 DUPLEX TO INCLUDE SHORT
         TERM ACCOMMODATION & OPERATIONAL WORKS AT 2/38 PARK CRES,
         SUNSHINE BEACH
    Committee Recommendation
    Moved:           Cr Wilkie
    Seconded:        Cr Jurisevic
    That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
    Committee Meeting dated 12 October 2021 regarding Application No. MCU17/0046.03 for an
    Other Change to a Development Approval for Multiple Housing Type 2 – Duplex & Operational
    Works to include Short-term accommodation, situated at 2/38 Park Cres Sunshine Beach and:
    A.   Refuse the application for the following reasons:
         1.     The proposal is not consistent with 3.2.4 Housing to meet diverse needs of the
                community and 3.3.3 Housing Choice (n) of the Strategic Framework, as it will
                further erode the dwelling units available for permanent housing in the area,
                impacting permanent resident amenity.
         2.     The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.6.2 Purpose and Overall Outcome (2)(o)
                and Performance Outcomes PO1, PO2 and PO15 of the Coastal Communities
                Local Plan Code as:
                a.   The extent of visitor accommodation has eroded the available supply of
                     permanent housing in the local plan area; and
                b.   Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental
                     impacts on the residential neighbourhood and amenity of permanent
                     residents.
         3.   The proposal is not consistent with 3.2.4 Housing to meet diverse needs of the
              community and 3.3.3 Housing Choice (n) of the Strategic Framework, as it will
              further erode the dwelling units available for permanent housing in the area,
              impacting permanent resident amenity.
         4.   The proposal is not consistent with 6.3.2.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(a)
              and (h) of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code as:




                                                                                    Page 20 of 29