08/0071 - Op Works - Driveway Access [As Published] · 142008.71

we ee oe ee ame

 

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 (DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

SECTION 4 Section 4 must be completed when the application seeks ks approval to carry out o) {operational work.
PLANNING SCHEME‘ :

41 say of the proposed operational work assessable under a planning scheme?
No -

 

      

 

 

  

 

Go to Q4.2 D1 Yes - (Complete Form 1, Part &) Answer Qs4.1.1 - 4.1.8 below.
| STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD © : rn : ;
4.1.1. | ts any part of the premises vain 100m of a ‘State-controlled toad; or part of a fature State-controlled road?
[No

If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, schedule 5 and
does it exceed the threshold?

| No Oo Yes - This application must be referred fo the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.

OYes

If yes, is all of the proposed operational work associated with the following?
© — Amaterial change of use that is assessable under the planning scheme DiNo DD Yes

 — Reconfiguring a lot that does not increase the total number of lots and does not increase the total []No [J Yes
number of lots abutting the State-controlled road

If no to either or both - Answer (a) - (c) below

(a) Is any of the proposed operational work associated with access to a State-controlled road?

No 7] Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
(b} Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
CI No C1 Yes

or is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road defined by route?
No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Advice Agency
0 Yes - This application must be referred to DMR as Concurrence Agency.

(c} Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater fomt the land,

through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625cm? that directs stormwater to a State-controlled road?
CINo (Yes

If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road defined by route?
CJ No - This application must be referred fo the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Advice Agency.
oO Yes - This application must be referred to DMR as Concurrence Agency.

wheduie 2, table 2. itm 5 iP Reguiation, sefuxitide 2. ttle i!

ACID SULFATE SOILS ne : gerade . .
4.1.2. | ls any of the operational work proposed in a local goverment a area listed ‘in State Planning Policy 202: Planning and Managing

Development Invopfing Acid Sulfate Soils?
[LNo We

i

  

IP Regndatin

  

 

 

 

    

 

S
If yes, is the natural ground level of any point where work is being carried out less than 20m AHD?
CNo C1 Yes
If yes, does the proposed operational work involve the following?
¢ — Excavating more than 1,000m* of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD a Dyes
+ Filling the premises with 1,000m? or more of material with an average depth of 0.5m on No (Yes

land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD

if yes to either or both - This appication must to be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as Advice Agency

JP Reguledion. schecuia 2. table 3, item 4: Stals Planning Polley 2A02: Planning and Managing Development involving Acie Sulfate Soits, section 3.6,

 

 

 

 

4a

Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cootoola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbroak, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Miriam Vate, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

Page 21