Council archive · source document
08/0071 - Op Works - Driveway Access [As Published] · 142008.71
“ INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007 te COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: WILD RIVER AREA’ = ees are 4.11 fe) Hf yes, is the proposed operational work for the following? i the operational work proposed to be carried out within a coastal management district? ok Ne (Yes Interfering with quarry material on State coastal land above high-water mark LINo [Yes Disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal waters CINo (Yes Draining or allowing drainage or flow water or other matter across State costal land above high- [JNo [_] Yes water mark Constructing or installing works in a watercourse where the works are not assessable under IPA, [}No L] Yes schedule 8, part 1, table 4, items 3 or 4 Reclaiming land under tidal waters Ono Dl Yes Constructing an artificial waterway, other than a canal, associated with reconfiguring a lot Line [Yes Constructing an artificial waterway that is a canal, associated with reconfiguring a lots CINo [Yes Constructing an artificial waterway not associated with reconfiguring a lot on land, other than State []No [[] Yes coastal land, above high-water if the maximum surface area of water on the waterway is at least . 5,000m2 : Constructing a bank or bund wall to establish a ponded pasture on land, other than State coastat [C]No [7] Yes land, above high-water mark @ Removing or interfering with coastal dunes on land, other than State coastal land, that is in an [No erosion prone area and above high-water mark . (Cl Yes 1 lfyes to one or more, is any of the proposed work to be carried out in a wild river area under the Wild Rivers Act 2005? O No - (Complete Form 1, Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). .If EPA is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. if yes, above, to any shown bold and marked gO with the symbol ®, the application also requires assessment by Queensland Transport (Marine Safety Qld) as Concurrence Agency. Yes tyes, is all of the proposed operational work for specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005? oO Yes - Unless the application is consistent with any. property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it (Complete Form 1, Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If EPA is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as concurrence Agency..lf yes, above,-t0 any shown bold and * marked with the symbol #, the application also requires assessment by Queensiand Transport (Marine Safety Qld) as Concurrence: . Agency. Subject to the declaration for the relevant wild river area, the application also requires assessment for the purposes of the Wild. | Rivers Act 2005. O No - An application for the operational work would be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. a 1, part 4, table 4, tems 4A and 5: Coastal Patectina and Manago Page 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0071 - Op Works - Driveway Access [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.