Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

08/0071 - Op Works - Driveway Access [As Published] · 142008.71

of 58

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

“

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

te

 

COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: WILD RIVER AREA’ = ees are

 

 

 

4.11

 

 

fe)

Hf yes, is the proposed operational work for the following?

 

i the operational work proposed to be carried out within a coastal management district? ok
Ne

 

(Yes

Interfering with quarry material on State coastal land above high-water mark LINo [Yes
Disposing of dredge spoil or other solid waste material in tidal waters CINo (Yes

Draining or allowing drainage or flow water or other matter across State costal land above high- [JNo [_] Yes
water mark

Constructing or installing works in a watercourse where the works are not assessable under IPA, [}No L] Yes
schedule 8, part 1, table 4, items 3 or 4

Reclaiming land under tidal waters Ono Dl Yes
Constructing an artificial waterway, other than a canal, associated with reconfiguring a lot Line [Yes
Constructing an artificial waterway that is a canal, associated with reconfiguring a lots CINo [Yes

Constructing an artificial waterway not associated with reconfiguring a lot on land, other than State []No [[] Yes
coastal land, above high-water if the maximum surface area of water on the waterway is at least .
5,000m2 :

Constructing a bank or bund wall to establish a ponded pasture on land, other than State coastat [C]No [7] Yes

 

 

land, above high-water mark @

Removing or interfering with coastal dunes on land, other than State coastal land, that is in an [No
erosion prone area and above high-water mark .

(Cl Yes
1

lfyes to one or more, is any of the proposed work to be carried out in a wild river area under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
O No - (Complete Form 1, Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). .If EPA is not the
Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. if yes, above, to any shown bold and marked
gO with the symbol ®, the application also requires assessment by Queensland Transport (Marine Safety Qld) as Concurrence Agency.
Yes

tyes, is all of the proposed operational work for specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?

oO Yes - Unless the application is consistent with any. property development plan applying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to
receive it (Complete Form 1, Part M) This application requires assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If EPA is not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as concurrence Agency..lf yes, above,-t0 any shown bold and *
marked with the symbol #, the application also requires assessment by Queensiand Transport (Marine Safety Qld) as Concurrence: .
Agency. Subject to the declaration for the relevant wild river area, the application also requires assessment for the purposes of the Wild. |
Rivers Act 2005.

O No - An application for the operational work would be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it.

 

a 1, part 4, table 4, tems 4A and 5: Coastal Patectina and Manago

 

 

Page 28

Used in these records

About this file

File size
4.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0071 - Op Works - Driveway Access [As Published].pdf · 4.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.