2009 KHA Original Report · REC14/0015

KHA Development Managers

May 2009

 

Specific Outcomes

EL les

 

land including within a national
park, conservation park, state forest
reserve, nature refuge, coordinated
conservation area or wilderness
area; and

b) nat located on steep slopes.

—

from national park, conservation
park, state forest reserve, nature
refuge, coordinated conservation
area or wilderness areas and do not
comprise steep slopes.

 

O6 Lots for residential development
are designed to ensure variety in
residential streetscapes.

$6.1 A variety of lot sizes and
shapes is provided within the
subdivision.

Complies

A variety of lot sizes are proposed.
The rear lots will not have any
direct impact upon the streetscape.

 

 

07 The street network—

a) has design features, which
convey the primary function of each
type of street and encourage driver
behaviour, speeds and traffic
volumes that are safe and
appropriate to that function;

b) provides a high level of internal
accessibility both within the site and
to external sites and appropriate
external connections for vehicles,
pedestrian and cycle movements;
¢) deters through-traffic from
residential areas and creates safe
conditions for focal road users,
pedestrians and cyclists;

d) incorporates street junctions and
access to lots that are located and
spaced to facilitate safe and
convenient vehicle movements;
‘| e) provides for street widths and
lengths that optimise the cost
effectiveness of the network and
the provision of public utilities;

f) provides for road reserve widths
Not less than the minimum
identified Section 2.3 of PSPS
Engineering Design Standards —
Roads, Drainage and Earthworks;
g) minimises the extent of
earthworks required by being
sympathetic to the terrain;

h) has no significant adverse effects
on habitat corridors or areas of
significant native vegetation;

i) does not create noise attenuation
difficulties;

j) incorporates pedestrian and
cyclist crossings at intersections or
where required to access high
activity nodes and public transport;
k) has regard to the potential for
conflict between vehicles,
pedestrians and cyclists; and

 

£) Sections 2 and 3 of PSPS _

$7.1 Where involving the
construction of a new road, road
planning and design supports the
hierarchy and functional aspects
identified in Sections 2 and 3 of
PSPS Engineering Design Standards
~ Roads, Orainage and Earthworks;
AND

$7.2 Road and pathway planning
and design is in accordance with, in
order of precedence—

a) Noosa Integrated Local Transport
Plan;

b) Queensland Transport’s Shaping
Up

C) Queensland Design Code for
Residential Streets;

d) AUSTROADS Guide to Traffic
Engineering Practice;

Engineering Design Standards-
Roads, Drainage and Earthworks;
f} The Noosa Cycling and Walking
Network Development Plan; or

9) A combination of the principles in
these documents;

AND

S7.3 The achievement of multiple
connections for all roads and streets
(excluding culs-de-sac) within the
subdivision and to adjoining
subdivisions;

AND

$7.4 Road networks provide
connectivity between residential
areas, both internally and to
adjoining sites, using access roads
AND

$7.5 The length of a cul-de-sac
does not exceed 200m in urban
areas and 500m in rural areas;
AND

S7.6 The layout uses street and
road design, including variations in

 

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part
of this application.

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part
of this application.

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part
of this application.

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part
of this application.

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part
of this application.

N/A
No new roads are proposed as part

 

 

 

Town Planning Report
Reconfiguration of a Lot
Eumundi Noosa Road, Noosaville

Page 17 of 31