Attachment_A-P-EA-100375359_(MCU__OPW_and_EA_Combined)

2212-32529 SRA

Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response

 

Document Set ID: 22365982

(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2070)

* The Operational Work and Material change of use for an ERA achieves compliance with the
applicable performance outcomes of State codes 8, 11 and 18 of the SDAP as follows:
© will not adversely impact coastal processes
© does not significantly increase the risk or impacts to people and property from coastal
erosion
© conditions will ensure that rehabilitation and long-term management of erosion will be
appropriately monitored and managed.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

The development application material and submitted plans

Planning Act 2016

Planning Regulation 2017

The State Development Assessment Provisions (version 2.3), as published by the department
The Development Assessment Rules

SARA DA Mapping system

The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
The proposed development complies with the assessment benchmarks and purpose statement within the
following codes:

State Code 7 — Maritime Safety as the proposed development is considered to:

not distract attention away from, or otherwise reduce the effectiveness of, aids to navigation
be designed and constructed to be visible to mariners, to avoid the risk of collision

does not interfere with the operation of aids to navigation

be conditioned to ensure it does not obstruct the safe movement of vessels in a navigable

waterway
State Code - Coastal development and tidal works 8 as the proposed development is considered
to:
protect life, buildings and infrastructure from the impacts of coastal erosion
maintain and conserve coastal resources
maintain appropriate public use of, and access to and along. State coastal land
account for the projected impacts of climate change
avoid impacts or, where the matters of state environmental significance cannot be reasonably
avoided, impacts are reasonably minimised and mitigated
« does not result in a significant residual impact on a matter of state environmental significance
unless the significant residual impact is acceptable, and an offset is provided
State code 11- Removal, destruction, or damage of marine plants as the proposed development is
considered to:
* maintains the extent, distribution. diversity and condition of marine plant communities and
protects the ecological functions to which they contribute
maintains the health and productivity of fisheries resources and fish habitat
minimises impacts on the management, use, development and protection of fisheries resources
and fish habitat
« is designed and located to avoid impacts or, where the matters of state environmental
significance cannot be reasonably avoided, impacts are reasonably minimised and mitigated
through conditions

State Assessment ang Referral Agency Page 10 0f 13

Version: 3, Version Date: 06/04/2023

Page 14 of 31