Council archive · source document
Referral Agency Response - Minor Change - RAP20 0003 01 [As Published] · RAP20/0003.01
Engineering Design
1. Council has undertaken a general audit check of the engineering design in relations to
the proposed works. A detailed check of the calculations and drawings has not been
undertaken, as they have been certified by a RPEQ. The RPEQ bears full responsibility
for all aspects of the engineering design. Council reserves the right to require further
amendments and/or additions at a later date should design errors become apparent.
Environmental Advisory Notes
2. The Environmental Protection Act 1994 states that a person must not carry out any
activity that causes, or is likely to cause, environmental harm unless the person takes
all reasonable and practicable measures to prevent or minimise the harm.
Environmental harm includes environmental nuisance. In this regard persons and
entities, involved in the civil, earthworks, construction and landscaping phases of this
development are to adhere to their ‘general environmental duty’ to minimise the risk of
causing environmental harm.
Erosion and Sediment Control
3. If appropriate ESC measures are not in place or are not satisfactory, “on the spot” fines
may be issued. Such fines can be issued if sediments from the site are found to enter or
have the potential to enter Council’s stormwater system, natural waterways, any
downstream stormwater filtration system or adversely impacting on other properties.
4. Accepted best practice standards include:
a. the Sunshine Coast Regional Council Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control
V1.2 or other superseding document subsequently adopted by Council;
b. Best Practice Erosion and Sediment Control, International Erosion Control
Association (2008)
5. As a general rule, a site is determined to have achieved effective short-term stabilisation
if at the time of the plan sealing inspection:
a. Methods of stabilisation are:
• appropriate for slopes and slope lengths; and
• are consistent with best practice environmental management practices such
as in the Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control or the IECA Manual; and
b. Stormwater runoff from the site is not currently, and is not likely to result in visible
evidence of sedimentation or erosion, or lead to water contamination.
6. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
The proposal is subject to specific built form parameters outlined in The Noosa Plan.
Type of Development Permit Required Subject of the Required Development Permit
Development Permit for Operational Works Driveway & Crossover
7. REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE
The applicant may make representations to Council about this referral agency response at
any time before the application is decided pursuant to section 30 of the Development
Assessment Rules.
Page 7 of 8
Document Set ID: 22383616
Version: 3, Version Date: 27/04/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Referral Agency Response - Minor Change - RAP20 0003 01 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 148 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.