Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Carol Hamilton - MCU25/0118
6. Excessive Distances to Essential Services
The development sits well beyond recommended distances (400-1000 m) to key services:
• Shops/medical: ~1.8 km
• Railway station: ~1.4 km
• High school: -2.5 km
Access to the nearest bus stop requires navigating unformed paths, a flood-prone
creek, rough terrain, and steep inclines—unsafe for vulnerable residents.
7. Inadequate Public Transport
No bus service passes the site, and Cooroy’s public transport is limited to only two daily
services. Residents would be car-dependent; even Coast2Bay’s CEO acknowledges most
tenants own vehicles.
8. Insufficient Parking
Parking falls short of minimum requirements, with actual demand expected to be higher due
to tenant car ownership and care worker visits. No on-street parking exists, and community
unit activities will increase pressure.
9. Traffic and Road Safety Risks
Dianella Court was designed for 28 households. Additional traffic will increase congestion,
reduce safety, and worsen turning and service vehicle access. Waste collection is already
constrained.
10. Inadequate Landscaping and Cemetery Buffering
A 3-metre setback cannot provide meaningful landscaping or a proper buffer to the cemetery.
Retaining walls further limit available space, and the proposal relies on cemetery land for
screening—reducing its future amenity.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Carol Hamilton - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.