Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber

of 37

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (14.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

,


           considering that children do spend a lot of time on outdoor school activities. When
           they are active, the inhalation rate increases and thus pollutant intakes".


    44.    Given that the proposed service station will generate substantially more traffic (in this
           case 129 cars per peak hour) within very close proximity (30 metres) to GSLC, it is
           reasonable to conclude that a much greater concentration                  of UFPs and VOC's from
           traffic emissions will penetrate the GSLCopen air pool facility and beyond.                      This is
           even more concerning given that the main group of people affected is children.


    45.    The above study notes the increased exposure simply from drop-off                         and pick-up
           traffic. This only represents a few minutes of close exposure in a day, compared with
           the more extended exposure to children at swimming lessons (anywhere between 30-
           90 mins) during which time they are actively inhaling the surrounding air.


    46.    It is to be stressed that the potential adverse health impacts will be evident regardless
           of what vapour recovery system the developer implements (I.e. VR1 and VR2) as the
           increased traffic will still be a constant factor.


    47.    Consequently, at the very least, it should be incumbent on the developer to provide
           an independent assessment, modelling the impact of traffic emissions on the GSLC,
           prior to any development proceeding.

              Harmful effect of petrol emissions from the service station

    48.    Emissions from service stations are widely acknowledged                     to contain compounds
           harmful to health, including:

                  •    benzene9
                  •    toluene
                  •    xylenes; and
                  •    ethylbenzene

    49.    Air toxins emitted from service stations include significant quantities of benzene which
           is a known health risk and carcinogenlO.


    50.    Exposure to emissions from service stations has been shown to be associated with
           increased risks of childhood leukaemia, independent of other risk factors (C Steffen et
           al 2004 - "Acute childhood           leukaemia and environmental             exposure to potential
           sources of benzene and other hydrocarbons; a case-controlstudy,,)lI.




    'The Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 Qld (EPP) sets exposure an objective for of 3 ppb (parts per
    billion) over a l-year period.
    10 (Morales Terres et ai, 2010). See file:///C:/Users/Kelly/Downloads/1-s2.0-S030l479710002574-
    main%20(2).pdf
    11 See http://www. ncbLnlm.nih .gov/pmc/articies/PMCl763669/pdf/v061p00773.pdf

                                                                                                                   11
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber.pdf · 14.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.