PM Submission Object - Kylie Moses MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

Page 2

                  The proposed development seeks to provide a small lot housing development and, in
                 particular, Multiple Housing Type 4 – Conventional which is not a consistent use in the Open
                 Space Recreation Zone;



                  The proposed development seeks to provide Visitor Accommodation Type 4, but not in
                 association with Visitor Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not consistent with the Open
                 Space Recreation Zone;



                   The proposed application appears to reflect an incorrect site cover percentage where some
                 structures have not been included in the calculation. An example of this is the stair and entry for
                 the Reed Beach Houses (refer pages SD12 and SD23). This is a clear omission and indicates that
                 either the developer is seeking to misrepresent the proposed site cover or they have been
                 inaccurate in their calculations by error. In either case the Noosa Council has an absolute duty to
                 reject the application until all inaccuracies have been identified and included in the Council’s
                 deliberations on whether this DA should be accepted.



                  The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach caravan park site for low cost
                 visitor accommodation;



                  Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but is not integrated as part of a
                 caravan park use or other form of budget accommodation;



                  The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited to be attractive, comfortable
                 and accessible to the public or provide suitable landscape treatments and amenities, conducive to
                 community interaction and convenience and public safety;



                  The proposed development is not consistent withthe reasonable expectations of residents in the
                 locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan site is to primarily provide for budget visitor
                 accommodation, which is in the public interest;



                  The Proposed development does not in any way conform to the written advice, cited below,
                 from the Council to the developer prior to the pre-lodgment meeting held on 14 December 2016
                 (between Council and the developer):




Document Set ID: 20306911
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 3

                          The Open Space Recreation zone in Peregian Beach specifically seeks to protect and
                          retain the site for low cost visitor accommodation needs reflective of the site’s previous
                          use as a caravan park, but also acknowledges that a range of visitor accommodation may
                          be provided where integrated with budget accommodation. There is no support given to
                          permanent residents on the site.



                          It is noted that the current approval included only visitor accommodation, with no
                          permanentresident accommodation proposed. This approved development was supported
                          by Council through an appeal process as it was acknowledged that it included low to mid
                          cost visitor accommodation being a reasonable alternative to the Planning Scheme’s
                          intent to retain the caravan park.



                          It is considered the current proposal does not meet the Planning Scheme’s intent for the
                          site as there is a lack of and a limited range of visitor accommodation proposed.



                  The Noosa Council has correctly performed, as reflected in the cited correspondence above, its
                 role as custodian of what was formerly publicly (ratepayer) owned land by informing the
                 developer that the DA proposal does not comply with the requirements requested by the Council
                 in regard to provision of low cost, non-permanent accommodation. For Noosa Council to now
                 allow the development application would be a failure of its duty to the Noosa ratepayers.



                 There are no grounds provided that are sufficient to overcome the level of conflict identified
                 with the Noosa Plan.



                 The proposed development application should be refused for the above reasons.

                 Kylie Moses

                 11 Whale Drive

                 Sunshine Beach 4567




Document Set ID: 20306911
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017

Page 4

                 Kylie Moses
                 0411 238 753 / 07 5447 5662




Document Set ID: 20306911
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017