Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object - Kylie Moses MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                  The proposed development seeks to provide a small lot housing development and, in
                 particular, Multiple Housing Type 4 – Conventional which is not a consistent use in the Open
                 Space Recreation Zone;



                  The proposed development seeks to provide Visitor Accommodation Type 4, but not in
                 association with Visitor Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not consistent with the Open
                 Space Recreation Zone;



                   The proposed application appears to reflect an incorrect site cover percentage where some
                 structures have not been included in the calculation. An example of this is the stair and entry for
                 the Reed Beach Houses (refer pages SD12 and SD23). This is a clear omission and indicates that
                 either the developer is seeking to misrepresent the proposed site cover or they have been
                 inaccurate in their calculations by error. In either case the Noosa Council has an absolute duty to
                 reject the application until all inaccuracies have been identified and included in the Council’s
                 deliberations on whether this DA should be accepted.



                  The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach caravan park site for low cost
                 visitor accommodation;



                  Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but is not integrated as part of a
                 caravan park use or other form of budget accommodation;



                  The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited to be attractive, comfortable
                 and accessible to the public or provide suitable landscape treatments and amenities, conducive to
                 community interaction and convenience and public safety;



                  The proposed development is not consistent withthe reasonable expectations of residents in the
                 locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan site is to primarily provide for budget visitor
                 accommodation, which is in the public interest;



                  The Proposed development does not in any way conform to the written advice, cited below,
                 from the Council to the developer prior to the pre-lodgment meeting held on 14 December 2016
                 (between Council and the developer):




Document Set ID: 20306911
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Kylie Moses MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 121 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.