ECM_23223278_v1_Further Advice Assessment Manager 132001 210127 4 · 132001.210127.4

Page 2

The information requested is set out below:
Issue – Elevations
The proposal includes ‘a reduction in built form along the eastern boundary’ (ie the Banksia
wing), however updated elevations have not been provided.
Information Required
1.   Provide updated Elevations for the proposed changes to the Banksia building.


Issue – Existing Approved Plans
The application seeks to amend Condition 15 (which references the old approved plans),
however does not propose to include these plans elsewhere. Some of the existing approved
plans (eg relating to the Darwinia and Eucalyptus wings) are still relevant and as such need
to be maintained, noting previous changes did not include the floor plans or elevations of the
Darwinia and Eucalyptus Wings.
Information Required
2.   Provide an amended request to amend Condition 15, stipulating the full list of plans to
     be retained and therefore included in the condition.


Issue – Increase in Fraction Impervious
The existing development layout was approved with a fraction impervious of 55.4%
(13,840m2). The change proposes a fraction impervious of 55.1% (13,765m2).
Given the vintage of the existing development and the significance of the receiving waters, it
is unclear if the development holistically achieves the acceptable stormwater quality targets
outlined in The Noosa Plan 2020 – Water Quality and Drainage Code.
You are advised that the documents included as part of the Operational Works application do
not include the above detail.
Information Required
3.   Provide additional detail demonstrating that stormwater runoff from the proposed
     development causes no increase in gross pollutants, total suspended solids, total
     phosphorous and total nitrogen from the existing development. The confirmation must
     be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ) experienced in stormwater quality
     and be accompanied by any necessary detail.


Issue – Manoeuvrability of the Maintenance Shed & Fire Access Trail
The proposed access drive to the existing maintenance shed shown on Enrich Architecture’s
Site Plan (DD_A_002.0, Rev. O) dated 1 July 2024 raises concerns regarding the
manoeuvrability for RCV and other vehicles expected to access this area (i.e., fire vehicles,
construction traffic, etc.).




                                                                                      Page 2 of 4

Page 3

            Figure 1 – Proposed Access Drive Extracted from Site Plan (002.0, Rev. O)
Information Required
4.      Provide Vehicle Swept Paths demonstrating the proposed access drive is functional for
        the vehicles intended to access this portion of the site. Vehicle Swept Paths must be
        prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ) and include, but not limited to:
             a. Swept paths for Refuse Collection Vehicles, ‘Medium Fire Vehicles’ (Type 5
                Vehicle), and the expected Construction Vehicles.
                  i.   Swept paths for ‘Medium Fire Vehicles (Type 5 Vehicle) and Construction
                       Vehicles must begin from the Cooyar Street ingress and conclude after
                       the first bend in the fire trail.




<
Advice Required
5.      <
Issue
<
Advice Required
6.      <
Issue
<
Advice Required
3.      <




                                                                                        Page 3 of 4

Page 4

3.    DUE DATE FOR RESPONSE TO FURTHER ADVICE

A response to the further advice is required by 8 October 2024. Email your response to
[email protected].    OTHER DETAILS

Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me on the number above.
Yours faithfully


Tara Norley
Senior Development Planner




                                                                                       Page 4 of 4