Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

ECM_23223278_v1_Further Advice Assessment Manager 132001 210127 4 · 132001.210127.4

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

The information requested is set out below:
Issue – Elevations
The proposal includes ‘a reduction in built form along the eastern boundary’ (ie the Banksia
wing), however updated elevations have not been provided.
Information Required
1.   Provide updated Elevations for the proposed changes to the Banksia building.


Issue – Existing Approved Plans
The application seeks to amend Condition 15 (which references the old approved plans),
however does not propose to include these plans elsewhere. Some of the existing approved
plans (eg relating to the Darwinia and Eucalyptus wings) are still relevant and as such need
to be maintained, noting previous changes did not include the floor plans or elevations of the
Darwinia and Eucalyptus Wings.
Information Required
2.   Provide an amended request to amend Condition 15, stipulating the full list of plans to
     be retained and therefore included in the condition.


Issue – Increase in Fraction Impervious
The existing development layout was approved with a fraction impervious of 55.4%
(13,840m2). The change proposes a fraction impervious of 55.1% (13,765m2).
Given the vintage of the existing development and the significance of the receiving waters, it
is unclear if the development holistically achieves the acceptable stormwater quality targets
outlined in The Noosa Plan 2020 – Water Quality and Drainage Code.
You are advised that the documents included as part of the Operational Works application do
not include the above detail.
Information Required
3.   Provide additional detail demonstrating that stormwater runoff from the proposed
     development causes no increase in gross pollutants, total suspended solids, total
     phosphorous and total nitrogen from the existing development. The confirmation must
     be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ) experienced in stormwater quality
     and be accompanied by any necessary detail.


Issue – Manoeuvrability of the Maintenance Shed & Fire Access Trail
The proposed access drive to the existing maintenance shed shown on Enrich Architecture’s
Site Plan (DD_A_002.0, Rev. O) dated 1 July 2024 raises concerns regarding the
manoeuvrability for RCV and other vehicles expected to access this area (i.e., fire vehicles,
construction traffic, etc.).




                                                                                      Page 2 of 4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
255 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

ECM_23223278_v1_Further Advice Assessment Manager 132001 210127 4.pdf · 255 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.