08/1689 - Operational Works - Signage [As Published] · 142008.1689

a”

With regard to 14.96 - Inconsistent advertising devices, the proposed advertising devices are not
inconsistent with specific outcome 01 given the sign face area of any sign does not exceed 4m?.

With regard to 14.97 - General design and amenity, the proposed signage does not offend probable
solution $2.1 and $2.2 as the site is located in the Shire Business Centre zone. Further, the proposed
signage does not offend $2.5 or $2.6 as the sign face does not exceed 4m?2.

The proposed signage satisfies the specific outcomes of the code in the following ways:

a. The proposed signage is of a human-scale in that is consistent with other existing signage in
the SBC and is compatible with the character of the existing and future development in the
area.

b. The proposed signage is compatible with the scale, proportion and bulk of buildings existing
in the locality and proposed on the subject land and will not dominate the surrounding built
form and natural landscape.

c. The proposed signage has been designed and sited to integrate with the proposed
development on the land and does not contribute towards the proliferation of visual clutter
given 1 sign is proposed per allotment. .

With regard to 14.98 - Safety, the proposed signage meets probable solution $3.1 as the signs
incorporate internal support and do not rely on external stays or wires and do not offend specific
outcome 03. Further, the proposed signage does not offend specific outcomes 04 and 05 in relation to
electricity supply infrastructure.

With regard to 14.99 - Medium impact signs, the proposed signage does not comply with probable
solution $6.3 in that the proposed signage exceeds 5m in height. This is the only area of noncompliance
with the Code.

The signage however does satisfy specific outcome 06 for the following reasons:

* The proposed signage respects the scale and nature of the surrounding development in
particular when having regard to the scale and height of development for Stage 1 of the
SBC including the approved signage on the site.

* When having regard to the size of the proposed allotments (0.6ha to 2.7ha) and the scale
of the approved development on this land, the proposed signage is of a similar height and is
of an appropriate scale for the development.

* The proposed signage contributes positively to the streetscape with 1 sign per allotment,
has an interesting design, is generally of light weight construction and is not out of
character with other signage within the SBC.

* The signage is intended to be located in a landscape setting either beside or within
landscaped areas of the approved development and/or beside open-space areas.

With regard to 14 .101- Illuminated Signs, the proposed signage complies with probable solution $8.1
with a condition able to be imposed to ensure lighting does not exceed a maximum luminance of 500
cd/m2. With regard to the probable solution $9.1 all conduits, witing, switches or other electrical
apparatus installed will be concealed from general view.

3. Conclusion

White the proposed signage does not comply with a probable solution in relation to the height exceeding
5m, this is the only area of non-compliance.

The proposed development does not offend the specific outcomes of the code and therefore meets the
overall outcomes and the purpose of the code. The approved development on the site is significant and
what is expected within the SBC with allotment areas in accordance with the master plan. The
development of the land could have been realised in other ways with a number of allotments having a