Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

A - Further Advice Notice

Attached to the e-mail MCU20/0037 - Response to Further advice - 11 Margit Crescent Sunrise Beach.

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                 Issue
                 The garage does not meet the definition of a basement and as such results in aspects of the
                 development being 3 storeys.
                 Advice Required
                 3.      Amended plans which demonstrate that the development does not exceed 2 storeys.


                 Issue
                 A number of aspects of the proposed development do not provide for an appropriate response
                 to the streetscape and amenity of surrounding properties. These concerns are related to:
                        The outdoor rooms situated above the garage;
                        The raising of the ground level to align with the floor level of the first floor and the
                         associated walls and fences to the side boundaries; and
                        Non-compliant setbacks


                 These result in:
                        Overlooking;
                        Presentation of excessive bulk to the streetscape and surrounding properties; and
                        Potential for overshadowing


                 Advice Required
                 4.      An amended proposal which reduces the scale and bulk of the development and which
                         protects the amenity of the adjoining properties.
                 Issue
                 It is also noted that there are other built form aspects of the development which contribute to
                 the excessive bulk and scale of the development, these include:
                        Near boundary to boundary development of garage and associated structures;
                        Centre wall between the dwellings within the front setback
                 Advice Required
                 5.      Amended plans which reduce the bulk and scale of the development.
                 Issue
                 The proposal to have 2 separate driveways and the impacts have not been adequately
                 addressed, specifically the Information Response has not addressed the Driveways and Car
                 Parking code requirements.
                 In regard to on-street parking, the proposal will reduce the on-street parking by 1 space. A
                 centrally located single driveway that complies with Council’s standard drawing (5m at the
                 kerb) will provide 2 oversize spaces either side within the sites frontage.
                 It is also considered that 2 crossovers will detrimentally impact on the streetscape and reduce
                 the opportunity for street trees and green space within the road reserve.




                                                                                                               Page 2 of 3
Document Set ID: 21233610
Version: 3, Version Date: 07/09/2020
Log in to download the original file

A - Further Advice Notice.pdf · 1.4 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.