07/0616 - MCU - Multiple Houseing Type 2 Duplex [As Published] · 132007.616

column 1
Specific Outcomes
iv For any other zone— 2 storeys;

 

column 2
Probable solutions (if code assessable)

Column 3

 
 

impact upon the Attunga Heights streetscape, as it lessens
the area the area of building fagade which provides an

 

 

a)
b}

c)
d)

 

areas and watercourses.

Site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio
og
and other roofed structures—

The site cover, gross floor area and pilot ratio of buildings

results in a building scale that is compatible with
susrounding development;

does not present an appearance of excessive bulk to
adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the vicinity of
the site;

maximises the retention of existing vegetation and allows
for additional soft landscaping between buildings;

allows for adequate area at ground level for outdoor
recreation, entertainment, clothes drying and other site

 

c) do not visually dominate the street or surrounding spaces; Mticulated, feature! iane (ie. doub! rage door)
. . . unarticulated, featureless p ie. double garage door);
q) preserve the amenity of surrounding fand, . - the sketch provided as Figure 9.2 in the Noosaville
€) respect the scale of surrounding vegetation; = Locality Code clearly demonstrates Council's support of
f) respond to the topography of the site by minimising cut and the provision of individual single garages, as opposed to
fill (eg. stepping down the site or using a suspended pole double garages;
construction); and - the provision of a single 6 metre garage opening will not
9) maintain a mature vegetated skyline. reduce the visual bulk or appearance of overall height of
the development. In will in fact require additional
excavation to be undertaken in order to achieve the
manoeuvring areas required;
- the provision of a shared garage arrangement raises a
number of security concems, particularly when taking into
consideration the short-term use of the majority of
properties located in Noosa Hill.
\ Setbacks
08 Buildings and other structures are appropriately designed $8.1 Buildings and structures comply with the minimum Complies with Specific Outcome —
and sited to— setbacks identified in Schedule 1 - Minimum Boundary _
a) _ provide amenity for users of the premises as well as Setbacks. i Setback [ The Noose] Proposal ||
preserve the visual and acoustic amenity of adjoining and _Plan____. = =
nearby properties; Front 6 metres 6 metres
b) _ preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer the Side 1.5 metres 1.5 metres
proposed building; 2.0 metres 1.5 metres (to *
c) allow for landscaping to be provided between buildings; $208) tes (to
d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and building line’ v
Fae EA ene ee tnin erosh [Rear | 6metes | 60metres | 7
e) protect public safety and property within erosion prone
areas by ensuring such areas are maintained largely free The upper level side boundary setback is located within
of development; and the required boundary setback. However, it is considered
f) protect the natural character and visual amenity of coastal that this 0.5 metre incursion is acceptable, as it relates

No solution provided

 

        
      

 

  

     
    
    
   
 

   
 

  
   

   

only to the provision of an open balcony. tn fact it is noted
that the building line of the dwelling units are each setback
approximately 4.5 metres from the side boundary,
considerably greater than those setbacks contained within
the Noosa Plan. The applicant submits conditions
regarding buffering vegetation along the side boundaries

may be recommended.

Complies — the proposal is of a scale compatible with
surrounding development and provides adequate area for
the establishment of significant vegetation.