Council archive · source document
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge Rackemann · 51987.2951.01
McInnes Wilson Lawyers No. 42 Seaview Terrace Horizontal extent of erosion (Case 1) Image 2: Horizontal extent of erosion adopted in Case 1 (based on information from Omtrek Pty Ltd). 6.2 Results Limiting equilibrium theory indicates that FOS values of less than or equal to 1.0 result in failure. It is generally recognised that long-term FOS values (e.g. over a project life) should be 1.5 or greater. Councils normally require a minimum FOS of 1.5 or greater. The modelling outputs are shown in Appendix B (Figures B1 to B4, representing Case 1 to Case 4, respectively). The results are summarised and discussed in Table 2 below. It should be noted that the modelling results are based on the occurrence of the hypothetical storm and wave scenario nominated by the coastal engineering experts. J000867-003-R-Rev0 Page 8 063 72
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge RackemannRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.