Original source · versioned page text
2 David Low Way - Town Planning Report - Urban Systems Pty Ltd
Attached to the e-mail Reconfiguration of a Lot (1 lot into 6) - RAL17/0501.
Original PDF page 59, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Table 16—Specific outcomes and probable solutions for the Eastern Beaches locality
Specific outcome Probable solution Applicant response
a) contribute positively to the local 600mm eaves to at least 75% of
skyline; the perimeter of the building;
b) complement the beachside AND
character of the locality; S12.2 Buildings and structures do
c) use soft and articulated pitched not include roof top terraces.
or curved roof forms;
d) avoid low pitched (eg. less than
5 degrees) or box
profiles/parapets; and
e) do not create opportunities for
residents to overlook the private
open space areas of neighbouring
properties.
Sloping sites S13.1 Buildings and associated Not applicable.
O13 Development on sloping accessways are not constructed The development does not involve
sites— on land with a slope greater than 1 building work.
a) is responsive to the natural in 4 (25%);
topography of the site and AND
minimises cut and fill; S13.2 Buildings are of split level
b) does not visually dominate the design that step down the slope or
hill slope or interrupt the skyline; have suspended floor
c) is integrated with the natural site construction;
characteristics including AND
vegetation; and S13.3 Cut or fill is less than 2m in
d) for Multiple housing, takes the depth;
form of small separate buildings. AND
S13.4 The distance between the
ground and the lowest part of the
floor of the building does not
exceed 3m to avoid large under-
building areas;
AND
S13.5 Buildings present no more
than—
a) if in the Visitor Mixed Use Zone
– 3 storeys at any one point when
viewed from the street; or
b) if in any other Zone - 2 storeys
at any one point when viewed from
the street.
7.10 Environment, conservation, and recreation
Environment and cultural heritage Complies with the specific
values outcome.
O14 There are no significant The proposed subdivision has
adverse effects on biodiversity, been designed around the
natural vegetation, native fauna features of the land and the
habitat, landscape quality, water existing development pad which
quality or cultural heritage values, houses two dwellings.
including those related to—
a) changes to natural drainage;
ROL, 2 David Low Way Page 35 August, 2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.