Council archive · source document
Ltr - 20250128 - Further Advice Response - 100 Hilton Terrace, Noosaville - Final · MCU24/0112
It is understood that the applicant is seeking a performance-based outcome for the provision of visitor car parking. The justification given that includes that the development will operate more like a dwelling house is not accepted. Small car parking spaces are not accepted. Advice Required Provide amended plans, which include at least one visitor car parking space, which is open to all bona fide visitors to the site and remove the small car parking spaces. Response: In response to Issue 1, the Applicant has reviewed the proposed design and included one (1) visitor car parking space located within the south-western corner of the site as illustrated in Figure 1 below. The visitor car parking bay has dimensions of 2.6m x 5.4m which is in accordance with the standard dimensions expected for a visitor car park. The proposed visitor car parking design is in accordance with PO6 and AO6 of the Driveways and Parking Code and is supported by the assessment and certification of the Applicant’s RPEQ, as detailed in Attachment C. A SWEPT path analysis has been undertaken by Urbis Ltd and is included in Attachment C which demonstrates the location of the visitor car parking bay maintains easy access to resident car parking areas, Figure 1 – Proposed Visitor Car Parking Location Source: Blight Rayner Roof Forms Issue 2 Ltr - 20250901 - Further Advice Response - 100 Hilton Terrace, Noosaville 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Ltr - 20250128 - Further Advice Response - 100 Hilton Terrace, Noosaville - Final.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.