Original source · versioned page text
Slope Stability Assessment
Jane & Cameron Blake 22178-001-Rev0
26 May 2022
Table 1: Stability Risk Levels
Risk Level Example Implications(1)
Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research,
Very High
VH planning and implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to Low; may
Risk
be too expensive and not practical. Work likely to cost more than value of property.
Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and implementation
H High Risk of treatment options required to reduce risk to Low. Work would cost a substantial sum
in relation to the value of the property.
May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulators’ approval) but requires
Moderate
M investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to reduce risk to Low.
Risk
Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be implemented as soon as practicable.
Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to reduce the
L Low Risk
risk to this level, ongoing maintenance required.
Very Low
VL Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
Risk
Note: (1) The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may
depend on the nature of the property at risk; these are only given as a general guide.
Considering the existing site conditions (Ref. Section 2), and subject to the implementation of
recommendations given in Section 4, it is assessed that there would a Low (L) Risk of global slope instability.
This is provided a suitable soil test report, building plans and earthworks drawings are reviewed by Tectonic
prior to construction. Regulators (NC) normally require that a Very Low or Low Risk of landslide affecting
property must be demonstrated to enable development approval. Summarised in Table 2 below is our
qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the site. A summary of qualitative terminology for use in
assessing risk to property is attached (taken from AGS 2007).
It should be noted that this risk assessment excludes geotechnical risk that may be associated with the
existing structures, dams and areas of the site outside of the proposed development areas.
Table 2: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence
Risk
Comments
The likelihood of a failure through future fill or natural
residual soil materials impacting the proposed
development is assessed as Unlikely due to the low
to moderate ground slopes across the proposed
1: Shallow failure through future
development area, favourable topography and
fill or natural soils above the Unlikely Minor Low
apparent lack of groundwater. The consequence of
foundation depth
such a failure would be Minor considering the
anticipated confined extent of instability, and the depth
of foundations recommended, with the resultant risk
being Low as per AGS 2007.
The likelihood of a deep failure through very stiff residual
soils or weathered phyllite below the foundation depth is
2: Deep failure through very stiff
assessed as Rare due to the strength of these materials
(or stiffer) residual soil or
Rare Major Low and no signs of previous deep-seated instability across
weathered phyllite below the
the proposed development areas. Although the
foundation depth.
consequence of such a failure could be Major, the
resultant risk is Low as per AGS 2007.
The potential impacts of slope instability on the proposed development have been assessed, and the
measures recommended below in Section 4 have been designed to mitigate those impacts so that a Low Risk
of instability would be achieved for the proposed secondary dwelling.
8/13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.