Council archive · source document
Planning Response letter to Council Information Request · MCU18/0015
Attached to the e-mail Response to Information Request (Planning Response & Architectural Plan Series Part 1)MCU18/0015 & RAL18/0001.
Response – Vegetation clearing associated with the proposed development will be limited to the
building envelopes nominated for the two dwelling houses and the building footprint nominated
for the units. The Bushfire Assessment Report included at Attachment 7 shows a vegetation
setback to be provided to unmanaged vegetation to facilitate a construction level of BAL 19 for
units 1 and 2 and BAL 29 for Units 3-12 and the dwelling houses. Trees within this setback zone
are able to be retained subject to management of the canopy understorey occurring. It is proposed
that the bushfire management procedures would form part of the Community Management
Statement for the dwellings. Any future rehabilitation plan prepared would be mindful of the need
for planting species to be low flammable species to minimise the risk of bushfire risk to the site
and surrounds.
Item 20 – Amended Site Comparison Plan to 2006 Proposal detailing the vegetation
removal/disturbance as per point 19.
Response – The architectural plan series included at Attachment 1 provides a comparison to the
previous development scheme and the current development scheme. A comparison against the
2006 scheme was provided in the original plan series submitted with the application.
Item 21 – Copy of operational works approval issued by the state for vegetation removal including
detail of the offset arrangements.
Item 22 – Assessment of the previous offset arrangements against those required as a result of the
proposed development.
Response – As part of the previous vegetation clearing approval issued by the State government
(a copy of which is included at Attachment 9) a vegetation offset was required to be secured on
the adjoining Viridian site. Whilst the previous development concept did not go ahead, we
understand that the vegetation offset required by the State government approval was completed
on the adjoining Viridian site and is shown on the Registered Plan included at Attachment 10.
In relation to the current proposal, the Ecological Assessment proposed by James Warren &
Associates included at Attachment 6 undertakes a comprehensive assessment of current state
legislation and determines that the proposed development does not require the provision of
offsets.
P: 07 5452 5207
E: [email protected]
45 First Ave, Mooloolaba Qld 4557
PO Box 1043 Maroochydore Q 4558
Page 8 of 19 townplanningsunshinecoast.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Planning Response letter to Council Information Request.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 649 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.