Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 145, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
A7 Infrastructure Uses Code
Table 14-21 – For all Infrastructure Uses
Specific Outcome Probable Solution Response
14.39 Effects of use
Location and siting
O30 The location and siting of Infrastructure S1.1 For Installations and Towers, where practicable, R1.1 Complies
Uses— infrastructure is — Approval is sought for an Installation, being a substation associated
a) maximises accessibility for a) co-located with existing Infrastructure Uses; or with the proposed development. The substation is most
maintenance purposes; and b) located on or within an existing building; appropriately located within the proposed development and is
b) does not disrupt access for other accessible from the proposed extension to Hofmann Drive.
AND
purposes.
S1.2 Easements for access to Infrastructure Uses are granted to R1.2 Can Comply
the Council or the beneficiary of the easement to ensure An easement can be granted to ensure access is available to the
suitable access can be gained, where practicable. substation should that be required.
Separation from incompatible uses
O31 Sufficient separation distance is provided No solution provided R31 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is provided)
between Infrastructure Uses and The proposed Infrastructure Use is a substation, which is proposed
incompatible uses on the same site and to be wholly located within the proposed building. Residential uses
neighbouring premises to maintain amenity are not located on the site or adjoining it. The substation is located
for neighbouring uses. adjacent to the loading docks and servicing bays and accordingly is
not expected to affect the operation or amenity of the proposed
development.
O32 Vehicular access to the site of the S3.1 Vehicle access to the infrastructure is gained from roads R3.1 Complies
Infrastructure Use does not adversely other than local residential streets to maintain residential Access is not proposed from a local residential street.
impact on residential amenity. amenity.
Building siting and design
O33 The siting and design of buildings or other No solution provided R33 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is provided)
structures reflects and is compatible with The proposed Infrastructure Use is a substation, which is proposed
the setting and character of the locality in to be wholly located within the proposed building. Impacts on the
which the Infrastructure Use is located, compatibility of the setting are not expected to occur as it will be
including the use of sympathetic colour hidden from view.
schemes.
Safety and security
O34 Infrastructure Uses are secure and potential S5.1 For Installations and Towers—the use is fenced with security R5.1 Alternative Solution
impacts from vandalism are minimised. fencing; The proposed substation is located within the proposed building to
AND be secure from vandalism.
S5.2 For other Infrastructure Uses—no probable solution R5.2 Not Applicable
December 2014 Cardno HRP A64
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.