Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 146, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Specific Outcome Probable Solution Response
Other Infrastructure Uses are not proposed.
Artificial lighting
O35 The generation of spill light by development, S6.1 Lighting associated with the use is designed, installed, R6.1 Will Comply
which gives rise to annoyance, discomfort, operated and maintained in accordance with Section 3 of Any lighting associated with the use, which is not anticipated given
distraction or a reduction in the ability to see AS4282 The Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor the use is located within the proposed building, will be designed,
essential information, is avoided. Lighting. installed, operated and maintained in accordance with AS4282 The
Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Mechanical plant and equipment
O36 Mechanical plant and equipment (including S7.1 Plant and equipment are— R7.1 Not Applicable
air conditioning equipment) are— a) located more than 2m from any property boundary; The proposed Infrastructure Use is a substation, which is proposed
a) positioned to minimise adverse and to be wholly located within the proposed building.
impacts on the amenity of any b) screened by dense vegetation or fencing (i.e. 1.5m
residential premises; wide vegetated buffer area);
b) designed and positioned to visually OR
integrate with the building and roof
design; and S7.2 Plant and equipment are located within a building. R7.2 Not Applicable
a) c) appropriately screened. The proposed Infrastructure Use is a substation, which is proposed
to be wholly located within the proposed building.
Environment & heritage values
O37 There are no significant adverse effects on No solution provided R37 Alternative Solution (as no Probable Solution is provided)
the biodiversity, natural vegetation, native The proposed development does not have any significant adverse
wildlife, habitats, landscape quality, water Advisory note impacts on landscaped quality, water quality or cultural heritage
quality or heritage values, including those
related to— PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details requirements values.
for the design and siting of effluent disposal The proposed development involves clearing a total of 7.5ha of
a) changes to natural drainage; vegetated land, which includes approximately 7.2ha of koala medium
systems where located outside a sewerage
b) disturbance to any of the wetland value bushland habitat and medium value rehabilitation habitat that
service area. Compliance with PSP24 will be
systems; supports approximately 3,118 non-juvenile koala habitat trees,
considered as part of Council’s assessment of the approximately 0.02h of potential Wallum Froglet and Wallum
c) management of landslide and fire
risk; plumbing and drainage application. Sedgefrog habitat and potential habitat for the Elf Skink.
d) erosion and the transport of The proposed development:
sediments off-site; > maximises tree retention within the covenant and commits to the
e) unmanaged public access; ongoing management of this area;
f) effluent disposal; > manages downstream impacts through integration of stormwater
management devices;
g) changes to fauna habitat and
behaviour; and > minimises impacts during construction through sequential clearing
under the supervision of a spotter catcher;
> improves downstream connectivity by replacing low flooded
culverts with a taller structure that will allow for wildlife movement;
December 2014 Cardno HRP A65
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.