Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 195, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
AO7.6 Measures are incorporated as part of siting and design of the
development to maintain or enhance water quality to achieve the
environmental values and water quality objectives outlined in the
Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009.
AND
AO7.7 Development avoids the disturbance of acid sulphate soils, or R7.7 Will Comply
where it is demonstrated that this is not possible, the disturbance of acid Acid sulfate soil (ASS) mapping indicates the site has low to
sulphate soils is carefully managed to minimise and mitigate the adverse negligible probability of ASS occurrence and any excavation will be
effects of the disturbance on coastal resources. above the water table.
There will be a small basin adjacent to the undercroft carpark
associated with a stormwater detention and bio-retention basin that
will include excavation below 5.0 m AHD.
Acid sulfate soils investigation works will be undertaken prior to
commencement of any earthworks on site after relevant site clearing
has taken place.
Refer to Appendix E – Engineering Report for further details.
PO8 Coastal protection work is undertaken only as a AO8.1 Coastal protection work is only undertaken to protect existing R8 Not Applicable
last resort where erosion presents an imminent threat permanent structures from imminent adverse coastal erosion impacts, and
to public safety or permanent structures. the structures cannot reasonably be relocated or abandoned.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal protection work AND
must be supported by a report certified by an RPEQ
that demonstrates how the engineering solution AO8.2 Coastal protection work to protect private structures is undertaken
sought by the work will be achieved. on private land to the maximum extent reasonable.
AND
AO8.3 Coastal protection work does not increase the coastal hazard risk
for adjacent areas or properties.
PO9 Development avoids adverse impacts on matters AO9.1 Development: R9.1 Complies
of state environmental significance, or where this is (1) is set back from matters of state environmental significance Refer to Appendix F – State and Local Government Ecological
not reasonably possible, impacts are minimised and Assessment.
an environmental offset is provided for any significant (2) avoids interrupting, interfering or otherwise adversely impacting
residual impacts to matters of state environmental underlying natural ecosystem components or processes and
significance that are prescribed environmental interactions that affect or maintain the matters of state environmental
matters. significance, such as water quality, hydrology, geomorphology and
biological processes, or
(3) incorporates measures as part of its location and design to protect
and retain matters of state environmental significance and underlying
ecosystem processes within and adjacent to the development site to
the greatest extent practicable.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify any threatened
species or their habitats, or threatened ecosystems that may be affected
by the proposal. In particular, applications should identify and describe
how the development avoids adverse impacts on any critical life stage
ecological processes within or adjacent to the development area.
December 2014 Cardno HRP A114
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.