Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 203, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
A19 – Module 18.1 Filling, Excavation and Structures State Code
The below code response has been prepared by Cardno HRP and Cardno Engineering. In addition to the Town Planning Report, reference should be made to the
Engineering Report (Appendix E) in reading this code response.
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
All development
PO1 Buildings, services, structures and utilities do not AO1.1 Buildings, structures, services and utilities are not located in a R1.1 Complies
adversely impact on the safety or operation of: railway, future railway land or public passenger transport corridor. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
(1) state transport corridors AND railway, future railway land or public passenger transport corridor.
(2) future state transport corridors AO1.2 Buildings and structures are set back horizontally a minimum of R1.2 Complies
(3) state transport infrastructure three metres from overhead line equipment. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of
AND overhead line equipment.
Editor’s note: For a railway, Section 3.2 – Structures, AO1.3 Construction activities do not encroach into a railway or public R1.3 Complies
setbacks, utilities and maintenance of the Guide for
passenger transport corridor. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
development in a railway environment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2014, provides guidance AND railway or public passenger transport corridor..
on how to comply with this performance outcome.
AO1.4 The lowest part of development in or over a railway or future railway R1.4 Complies
land is to be a minimum of: The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
(1) 7.9 metres above the railway track where the proposed development railway or future railway land.
extends along the railway for a distance of less than 40 metres, or
(2) 9.0 metres above the railway track where the development extends
along the railway for a distance of between 40 and 80 metres.
Editor’s note: Part A.10 – Clearances of the Guide for development in a
railway environment, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, 2010,
provides guidance on how to comply with this acceptable outcome.
AND
AO1.5 Existing authorised access points and access routes to state R1.5 Complies
transport corridors for maintenance and emergency works are maintained. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a state
AND transport corridor.
AO1.6 Pipe work, services and utilities can be maintained without requiring R1.6 Complies
access to the state transport corridor. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a state
AND transport corridor.
AO1.7 Pipe work, services and utilities are not attached to rail transport R1.7 Complies
infrastructure. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
AND railway.
AO1.8 Buildings and structures are set back a minimum of three metres R1.8 Complies
from a railway viaduct. The proposed development is not located within the vicinity of a
AND railway.
December 2014 Cardno HRP A122
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.