Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 210, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to AO2.1 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport R2.1 Not Applicable
a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts corridor, the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with The proposed development complies with AO2.3 and AO2.4.
on a future or existing state transport corridor. section 1.4.3 of the Road drainage manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2010 and section 3.02 of Queensland urban drainage
manual, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 2013.
OR
AO2.2 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway, R2.2 Not Applicable
approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway, as defined in The proposed development is not within the vicinity of a railway.
the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, schedule 6 has been gained to verify
the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway.
AND
AO2.3 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of R2.3 Complies
stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor Stormwater run-off will be directed to a lawful point of discharge
during construction or thereafter. being the drain contained within Covenant J. The proposed
AND development is not within the vicinity of a state transport corridor.
AO2.4 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or R2.4 Complies
changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the Stormwater run-off will be directed to a lawful point of discharge
state transport corridor. being the drain contained within Covenant J. The proposed
development is not within the vicinity of a state transport corridor.
Sediment and erosion management
PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed AO3.1 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates R3.1 Alternative Outcome
to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause erosion and sediment control measures. The development will have a low erosion risk. An erosion sediment
siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state Editor’s note: For a state-controlled road where a development has a control plan has been prepared for the construction phase. In
transport corridor. moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 13.5 of the Road drainage addition a stormwater management plan has been prepared for both
manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2010, an erosion and the construction and operational phases of the development to
sedimentation control plan should be provided to support either a minimise the siltation risk.
stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan.
December 2014 Cardno HRP A129
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.