Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance

of 239

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Original PDF page 210, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

                                                                                                                                                                                   Town Planning Report
                                                                                                    28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive



 Performance Outcomes                                    Acceptable Outcomes                                                            Response
 PO2 Stormwater run-off and drainage are directed to     AO2.1 Where stormwater run-off is discharged to a state transport              R2.1 Not Applicable
 a lawful point of discharge to avoid adverse impacts    corridor, the discharge is to a lawful point of discharge in accordance with   The proposed development complies with AO2.3 and AO2.4.
 on a future or existing state transport corridor.       section 1.4.3 of the Road drainage manual, Department of Transport and
                                                         Main Roads, 2010 and section 3.02 of Queensland urban drainage
                                                         manual, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 2013.
                                                         OR
                                                         AO2.2 For development on premises within 25 metres of a railway,               R2.2 Not Applicable
                                                         approval from the relevant railway manager for the railway, as defined in      The proposed development is not within the vicinity of a railway.
                                                         the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, schedule 6 has been gained to verify
                                                         the lawful point of discharge for stormwater onto the railway.
                                                         AND
                                                         AO2.3 Development does not cause a net increase in or concentration of         R2.3 Complies
                                                         stormwater or floodwater flows discharging onto the state transport corridor   Stormwater run-off will be directed to a lawful point of discharge
                                                         during construction or thereafter.                                             being the drain contained within Covenant J. The proposed
                                                         AND                                                                            development is not within the vicinity of a state transport corridor.
                                                         AO2.4 Development does not create any additional points of discharge or        R2.4 Complies
                                                         changes to the condition of an existing lawful point of discharge to the       Stormwater run-off will be directed to a lawful point of discharge
                                                         state transport corridor.                                                      being the drain contained within Covenant J. The proposed
                                                                                                                                        development is not within the vicinity of a state transport corridor.
 Sediment and erosion management
 PO3 Run-off from upstream development is managed        AO3.1 Development with a moderate to high risk of erosion incorporates         R3.1 Alternative Outcome
 to ensure that sedimentation and erosion do not cause   erosion and sediment control measures.                                         The development will have a low erosion risk. An erosion sediment
 siltation of stormwater infrastructure in the state     Editor’s note: For a state-controlled road where a development has a           control plan has been prepared for the construction phase. In
 transport corridor.                                     moderate to high risk of erosion as per section 13.5 of the Road drainage      addition a stormwater management plan has been prepared for both
                                                         manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2010, an erosion and           the construction and operational phases of the development to
                                                         sedimentation control plan should be provided to support either a              minimise the siltation risk.
                                                         stormwater management statement or stormwater management plan.




December 2014                                                                              Cardno HRP                                                                                             A129
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0106 & OPW15_0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance.pdf · 3.7 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.