Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 39, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Retail Business
(Type 7 Garden and $140 / m2 GFA $10 / m2 of impervious GFA
Lifestyle Centre)
Wellbeing
$70 / m2 GFA $10 / m2 of impervious GFA
(Type 2 Social)
Service and Utility Determined by Council based on the nature of the
$10 / m2 of impervious GFA
(Type 2 Installation) use
It is noted, however, that the site is subject to an existing Infrastructure Agreement (Agreement). The
Agreement, dated 3 October 2003, was entered into by Mirose Pty Ltd and the former Noosa Shire Council.
The Agreement is an Infrastructure Agreement for the purposes of the SPA.
6.2.3 South East Queensland Koala Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions
The site is located within a Koala Assessable Development Area under the South East Queensland Koala
Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions.
Division 7 of the State Planning Regulatory Provisions is applicable to the proposal and provides assessment
criteria for development proposals, a response to which is provided in the below table.
Assessment Criteria Applicant’s Response
1. To the extent the premises is outside the Urban Not Applicable
Footprint and not in an urban area under a planning The site is located within the Urban Footprint.
scheme, site design does not result in the clearing of
non-juvenile koala habitat trees in areas of bushland
habitat.
2. To the extent the premises is inside the Urban Complies
Footprint, site design must avoid clearing non-juvenile The proposed Noosa Civic expansion will necessitate the
koala habitat trees in areas of bushland habitat, with any clearing of approximately 7.2ha of koala medium value
unavoidable clearing minimised and significant residual bushland habitat and medium value rehabilitation habitat
impacts counterbalanced under the Environmental that supports approximately 3,118 non-juvenile koala habitat
Offsets Act 2014. trees. This unavoidable clearing will be offset as a financial
settlement under the Queensland Environmental Offset
Policy 2014.
3. Site design must avoid clearing non-juvenile koala Complies
habitat trees in areas of high value rehabilitation habitat, Refer to Response to 2 above.
and medium value rehabilitation habitat, with any
unavoidable clearing minimised and significant residual
impacts counterbalanced under the Environmental
Offsets Act 2014.
4. Site design provides safe koala movement Complies
opportunities as appropriate to the development type An Assessment against the factors outlined in Schedule 2 is
and habitat connectivity values of the site determined by presented below:
reference to the factors for consideration in Schedule 2.
1. The site’s location with regards to the following:
a. areas of vegetation that are a koala habitat type—with
particular focus on bushland habitat, high value
rehabilitation habitat, and medium value rehabilitation
habitat;
The site predominantly includes areas of medium value
bushland habitat but also includes medium value
rehabilitation and areas that are generally not suitable.
b. areas that are remnant or regulated regrowth regional
ecosystems where koalas are known to occur;
There are no remnant or regulated regrowth regional
ecosystems within the site.
c. areas of ecological significance;
Areas corresponding with medium value bushland habitat
are also mapped as MSES on the SPP interactive mapping
system (DA).
d. waterway and ecological corridors.
December 2014 Cardno HRP 39
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.