Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 85, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Specific Outcome Probable Solution Response
or Weyba Rd, James St and Albert St b) if in the Visitor Mixed Use Zone – 12m; Part of the proposed development is also located in Precincts E7, OS7
north of their intersections with c) if in the Business Centre or Industry Zones — 10m; and B1, with a maximum building height in those precincts
Elizabeth St (as well as properties respectively of 9.0m, 12.5m and 9.5m. Maximum building height in
fronting Gympie Terrace or Noosa d) if in the Shire Business Centre Zone – 8m, except in those precincts exceeds the requirements of S8.1.
Parade between Weyba Road and Precinct E1 or E2 where 12m or in Precinct REC/MU where
6m; In the case of Precincts E7 and B1 the proposed development
Russell Street), where they are not to complies with the requirements of O8, as the proposal in those
exceed a maximum building height of 3 e) in all other zones—8m. precincts does not exceed 10 metres, being 2 storeys as defined by
storeys; The Noosa Plan. In relation to those precincts, building height is low
ii. for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone– 3 scale, will not visually dominate the street as it is located well within
storeys, although present only 1-2 the site, against the boundary to Covenant J and is well separated
storey façades to Gympie Terrace; from the internal and external road network as well as development
iii. for the Shire Business Centre Zone– 2 on adjoining sites. The proposal responds to the topography of the
storeys, except in Precinct E1 and E2 site and includes a variety of built form elements and a mix of materials
where 3 storeys and Precinct REC/MU and finishes for visual interest.
where 1 storey; and The development will be well screened by vegetation on the site.
iv. for all other zones— 2 storeys; In relation to Precinct OS7, where parts of the precinct are within the
c) do not visually dominate the street or Open Space Conservation Zone (the two do not precisely align), the
surrounding spaces; proposed development exceeds 2 storeys or 10 metres in height. The
height in this location is associated with the pedestrian link.
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding
land; Refer to Chapters 7 and 8 of the Town Planning Report and Appendix
B – Architectural Drawings and Architectural Design Report for
e) ensure that development responds to the further details.
site topography; and
f) are well articulated with strong horizontal
and vertical design elements to provide
an interesting streetscape and to
complement landform changes and
landscapes.
Setbacks
O9 Buildings and other structures are S9.1 Buildings and structures comply with the setbacks identified R9.1 Alternative Solution
appropriately designed and sited to— in Schedule 1 - Minimum Boundary Setbacks. Refer to Chapter 7 of the Town Planning Report for a discussion on
a) provide amenity for users of the premises the proposed alternative solution.
as well as preserve the visual and
acoustic amenity of adjoining and nearby
properties;
b) provide adequate distance from adjoining
land uses;
c) allow space for required vehicle parking;
d) preserve any existing vegetation that will
buffer the proposed building;
e) allow for landscaping to be provided
between buildings;
December 2014 Cardno HRP A4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.