Council archive · source document
Attachment 5 - Geotechnical Assessment · MCU18/0015
] LT] RTI_11/055 Folio B392 November 2003 -8- 03632248-001 initiating instability. Local erosion control measures (e.g. gabion baskets) to protect the creek banks both here and elsewhere should be considered in detailed design. , The presence of this possible slip indicates that the steeper parts of the sand dune are close to equilibrium (ie. factor of safety ~ 1). Our stability analysis indicates that when the groundwater level rises 0.7 m above the lower interface of the very loose sand, the minimum factor of safety reduces less than one for a 5 m long slip circle located on the lower part of the slope (ie. in the bank of the creek). For a fully specified slip surface through the very loose sand and extending up slope for a distance of about 20 m, the factor of safety is about 1.3, being slightly less than acceptable for long-term stability. From the above observations and stability analyses, it is considered likely that surface slumping of the sand can occur within about 20 m of the creek after periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This needs to be considered in the detailed design of the.footings for structures (Section 7.3). Subject to the implementation of the geotechnical advice in Section 7,0, it is our opinion that there will be a Low to Moderate Risk of slope instability affecting the proposed development. Such a level of risk is manageable provided that the proposed treatment options are adopted. This risk assessment has been carried ott following the AGS Sub-Committee Guidelines on Landslide Risk Management (March:2000)» Relative levels of risk and their implications are given in the table below. Table 4: Relative Risk Leyels & Implications for Development VH VERY HIGH RISK | Extensive detailed investigation and research, planning and implementation of treatment options essential to reduce to acceptable levels; may be too expensive and not practical. H HIGH RISK Detailed investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options required to reduce risk to acceptable levels. M MODERATE RISK | Tolerable provided treatment plan is implemented to maintain or reduce risks, May be accepted, May require investigation and planning of treatment options. , L LOW RISK Usually accepted. Treatinent requirements and responsibility to be defined to maintain or reduce risk. VL VERY LOW RISK | Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures Note:(1)The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment; these are only given as a general guide. Golder Associates
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 5 - Geotechnical Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.