Original source · versioned page text
2021-06-14 General Committee Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 14 JUNE 2021
Page 21 of 25
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 14 JUNE 2021
ATTACHMENT 1
EXCERPT
NOOSA SHIRE — WATERWAYS ASSESSMENT 2017
AN ASSESSMENT OF NOOSA WATERWAYS TO INFORM THE NOOSA PLAN & REHABILITATION
STRATEGIES
Paperbark and Sedgeland Dominated Non-Riverine Wetlands and Estuarine Area
Within the current Vegetation Management Act, except where exemptions or Accepted
Development Vegetation Clearing Codes apply, clearing both within and within 100m of a wetland
(non-riparian and estuarine) conflicts with Acceptable Outcomes for assessable vegetation clearing.
Ideal Buffer distance recommendations for wetlands from a water quality perspective do however
largely depend on the method of water input to the wetlands — either surface or groundwater
infiltration and the geographical source of such waters. Specific information of this nature does not
currently exist comprehensively and accurately across the shire and as such the generalization of
100m is recommended as per regulatory guidelines. (P.62)
“A number of initiatives are potentially available that could provide wetland value and water quality
outcomes within non-riparian and estuarine wetlands. These initiatives could include:
e Actions to preserve wetland quality, in particular management of transformer weeds and
feral animal pets, particularly feral pigs.
e Cattle access and fencing.
e Reinstatement of wetland vegetation, both within wetlands themselves and within desired
wetland buffer areas.
e Reinstatement of surface freshwater flow and condition, in and around wetlands where
channelization or alteration has occurred.
e §=Retrofitting and reconstruction of road crossings in wetland areas to reduce the effect of
narrowing and concentrating flow causing both upstream and downstream riverbank and
bed disturbance. Fish and aquatic fauna passage would also benefit directly from this
activity.
e Engagement and or regulatory programs to upgrade effluent disposal systems and their
impact on producing discharge into shallow aquifers in targeted areas such as Cootharaba.”
(P.66)
Page 21 of 25See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.