Original source · versioned page text
ATTCH 7 - IR Response - Engineering (Sheehy & Partners)
Attached to the e-mail RAL17/0501 IR Response email 4 of 4.
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
four (4) 13, Refer to Drawings 8531 - J, 8531 - K and 8531 - L below. [OCR of page images] A.C.N. 009 899 905 A.B.N. 52 009 899 905 DIRECTORS: S. Thomas, B.Eng:(Hons), M.I.E.Aust. S. McDonald, B.Eng. (Hons), M.1.E.Aust. MBA B. Mortimore, B.Sc, MICE, F.l.E.Aust. a a ms Gregory Terrace SPRING HILL QLD 4000 Phone: (07) 3839 3644 Facsimile: (07) 3839 3655 © Email: [email protected] 8531 Attention: Lisa Pienaar Noosa Council PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 Response to Information Request Planning Act 2016 RAL17/0501 - Lot 71 MCH 2854, 2 David Low Way Castaways Beach Qld 4567 Sheehy & Partners Pty Ltd has been engaged to respond to four (4) specific civil design issues raised in the Noosa Council request for information dated the 7th of September 2017. The issues addressed here are those numbered 13, 14, 15 and 16 in the RFI. Issue - Site access and traffic Information Required 13. Assess and achieve Safe Intersection Sight Distance requirements at the proposed driveway as defined by the Austroads guidelines, consistent with the requirements of Section 3.10 of PSP5, based on the design speed of David Low Way determined from a speed survey. Response: Refer to Drawings 8531 - J, 8531 - K and 8531 - L below. Information Required 14. Modify the proposed site access design so that a HRV can turn into the site from wholly within the proposed BAL left turn lane, without using the adjacent through lane, so that the vehicle can wait in that lane clear of through traffic, if there is another vehicle waiting to depart from the access at that same time. Otherwise the site access should be redesigned to accommodate turning to the access by a HRV at the same time as a car is departing the site. Also, the taper for the proposed BAL treatment needs to be lengthened to comply with Austroads standards. Response: The site access has been modified to accommodate the design vehicle (HRV) turning wholly within the BAL left turn lane. 8/11/2017 1|Page
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 16 pages
Page 2
8531 Information Required 15. Modify the proposed vertical alignment of the proposed access to David Low Way, to satisfy the grading requirements of AS/NZS 2890.1-2004, particularly in achieving satisfactory grades across the verge and on the approaches to the existing pedestrian / cycle path from both directions on the driveway (as vehicles using the driveway will need to give way to pedestrians / cyclists on that path). The proposed alterations to the existing vertical alignment of the existing path should also be identified. : Response: The access grading is shown on Longitudinal Section 8531-R rev2. The grading requirements in AS 2890.1:2004 are as follows: “AS2890.1 2004 2.6.2 Gradients The maximum gradient of domestic driveways shall be 1 in 4 (25%). The maximum gradient of the associated access driveway across a property line or building alignment shall be 1 in 20 (5%) and across a footpath as specified in Clause 3.3(d). 3.3 GRADIENTS OF ACCESS DRIVEWAYS At entry and exit points, the access driveway should be graded to minimize problems associated with crossing the footpath and entering the traffic in the frontage road. Maximum gradients on and near access driveways, other than at domestic properties (see Clause 2.6), shall be as follows: (d) Across footpaths—where the driveway crosses a footpath, the driveway grade shall be 1 in 40 (2.5%) or less across the footpath over a lateral distance of at least 1.0 m.” The proposed grading of the driveway does not exceed 25% with a maximum 20% adopted near David Low Way to minimise the vertical realignment of the footpath and no greater than 16% on the remaining access driveway. Across the footpath a gradient of 2.5% has been incorporated to satisfy clause 3.3(d) of 2890.1:2004 with a 3% cross fall extended from the existing David Low Way for the width of the left turn lane. The existing shared footpath / cycleway generally follows the vertical alignment of the adjacent David Low Way and has been realigned and regraded to suit the proposed access to the development. Figure 1 below shows the proposed grading of the shared footpath / cycleway on the approaches to the new access. The gradients on the approaches does not exceed 6.205% (1:16). AS 1428.2:1992 suggests that rest points should be provided at 9m spacings for gradients of 1:14 and 15m for gradients of 1:20 with values interpolated in between. As the proposed gradient is 1:16 on the northern approach, the suggested spacing would be 10m. The proposed regrading of the ramp on the north side of the access is 9m in length. It is therefore proposed that the driveway access (2.5%) provides a suitable rest area within the 10m requirement and 8/11/2017 2| Pa
Page 3
8531 no further provision is proposed. The regrading to the south of the new access driveway reduces the gradient to 1.012% which is less that the 3% suggested by AS1428.2:1992 as the point at which rest areas are required. No provision of rest areas is proposed for the northern approach. FIGURE 1: PROPOSED REGRADING OF THE EXISTING SHARED FPPTPATH / CYCLEWAY Information Required 16. Prepare a plan identifying refuse bin pad storage locations for each lot (2 wheelie bins per lot), together with the path of a refuse vehicle to/from and within the site, satisfactorily servicing each bin location. Visitor parking should also be identified on that plan (satisfying a minimum requirement of 0.5 visitor spaces per lot) clear of those refuse collection requirements and clear of potential driveways to the individual sites. Titling arrangements would also need to be clarified for the visitor parking to ensure that visitor spaces are available for all 6 lots, rather than being associated with specific allotments. Visitor parking would need to be clearly designated and signed as being for visitors only. This is important because overflow parking from the site will not be acceptable. Response: Visitor Parking AS 2890.1 : 2004 identifies the parallel parking arrangements for off road parking in Figure 2.5 shown below: 8/11/2017 3|Page
Page 4
8531
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 18
yKerb ~ Wall, fence, columns etc
/ F300 fein Apaee mm high (see Note 1)
~
3
°.
3
5
lJ
Poi l us | to |
w ~ 7/7 RHS kerb of one-way road, or 300
{ £__centre line of two-way road Bt
~ ~ ~ ~ — - So —e— 7 ye i
“~—Wall, fence, columns ete |
>300 mm high (see Note 2)
metres
Space length
i i Space length unobstructed end
Aisle width Space length, L obstructed end
(one-way), W P gt, spaces, L,
spaces, L,
(Note 4)
3.0 6.3 6.6 5.4
3.3 6.1 6.4 5.4
3.6 5.9 6.2 5.4
For the six proposed six (6) lots three (3) visitor parking bays will be required. These will be
located within the 6m wide driveway easement as shown on Figure 2 below. Parking bays are
2.1m wide with an aisle width of 3.6m (one way). Two (2) bays will be unobstructed end spaces
and one (1) will be an intermediate space sized in accordance with Figure 2.5 AS2890.1: 2004
(refer table above). The total length of parking spaces required is 16.7m. These have been
located between two potential locations for driveway accesses to Lots 713 and 714 and on the
opposite side of the accessway to allow unencumbered access to the bin bays for the refuse
collection and so as not to obstruct sight lines from the properties. A 0.3m offset has been
allowed for clearance to any obstruction (vegetation) >0.3m in height between the parking bay
and the driveway easement boundary.
Bin Pad Storage Locations
Bin pad storage locations (2m x 1m) for two bins have been identified on the Figure 2 below.
The locations are readily accessible for the refuse collection truck and property driveways.
The refuse vehicle will access the site from David Low Way and utilise the turning head at Lots
711 and 712 to exit the site on the same path. All refuse bins will be accessible to the refuse
truck on its exit path from the development along the driveway.
The turning head has been sized using Brisbane City Council Standard Detail Drawing BSD-3001
for an Offset T Head arrangement for residential streets.
Supporting Preliminary Design Drawings
The following associated civil drawings are also attached below for information and
consideration:
8/11/2017 4|Page
Page 5
e 8531-A e 8531-B e §8531-C e 8531-D e 8531-E e 8531-H e 8531-J e §8531-K e §8531-L e 8531-M e §=8531-N e 8531-0 8531 General Layout and Services Plan Bulk Earthworks Layout Plan Bulk Earthworks Graduation Layout Plan Bulk Earthworks Site Sections Driveway Longitudinal Section Sewer Reticulation Longitudinal Section Safe Intersection Sight Distance Layout Plan Safe Intersection Sight Distance Normal Day Car Longitudinal Sections Safe Intersection Sight Distance Truck Day Longitudinal Sections David Low Way Cross Sections (Sheet 1 of 2) David Low Way Cross Sections (Sheet 2 of 2) Driveway Access Truck Swept Path Should you require any further information in relation to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr Brian Mortimore of our office. Yours faithfully / é WA bas B Mortimore for and on behalf of SHEEHY & PARTNERS PTY LTD Consulting Engineers 8/11/2017 5|Page
Page 6
1.50
1.62
1.46
1.43
1.46
FL/
SIGN/
SIGN/
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N\@500di\853INACAD\PLANNING\853I-A dwa
PLOT DATE-> 06 Nov, 2017-4.40pm
LEGEND
STAGE BOUNDARY
‘Sw PROPOSED STORMWATER
— — SwD — — EXISTING STORMWATER
s PROPOSED SEWER
—— — S— — EXISTING SEWER
— — RM— — EXISTING SEWER RISING MAIN (TRACED)
Ws PROPOSED WATER
EXISTING WATER (TRACED)
—— E0/H — — _ EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
VEGETATION LINE
ss PROPOSED PAVEMENT
Y
\
ht 7
4
=A
4
RE-ALIGN EXISTING FOOTPATH
i
! SEWER LIVE WORK CONNECTION
-—-P-~;_
~
Sf _ ~S
~
7
EXISTING SERVICE BAY 22.334m EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE
TO BE RECONSTRUCTED ADJUSTED TO SUIT SAFE INTERSECTION
EXISTING STORMWATER GULLY PITS TO SUIT ROAD WIDENING SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED STORMWATER ae IDEAING RELOCATED TO SUIT
DISCHARGE AND CULVERT
BENEATH DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED BAR TREATMENT
WATER LIVE WORKS CONNECTION ROAD WIDENING
LAYOUT PLAN
o 10 15-20 25
SCALE ™ 4500 (At)
: , DRAWING NUMBER:
© commen SURVEYOR: CENT PROIEST: ——e ~*~ Se PLANNING
THE NFORMATION CONTAINED IN DESIGNED: SB _
reer aca KENLYNN PTY LD 2 DAVID LOW WAY, ceca, PH | concucr aust atin AmPARTNERS 8531-A
Pry CIMITEO
COPYING OF THIS DOCUMENT IN 3 [DRIVEWAY REVISED. Nov'17 | RT| pRAWN: SB CONSULTING ENGINEERS FULL SIZE At
MITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 [DRIVEWAY REVISED AND TURNAROUND ADDED | ocT ‘17 | SB Veheckep. pm — i STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL GENERAL LAYOUT AND SERVICES PLAN 1 2] 3] l l l
ANO PARTNERS CONSTITUTES AN + ISEWER PIT LABELS ADDED wuLY a} SB Firm PHO7)SES9 3644 FAK(O) SEBO 3655
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT "AMENDMENTS DATE [INTIALS| DATE: JUNE “17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 7
1.50
1.62
1.46
1.43
1.46
FL/
SIGN/
SIGN/
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N\@500d5 \853I\ACAD\PLANNING\8531-8.d0g
PLOT DATE-> 06 Nov, 2017-4.40pm
LEGEND
DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY
Q100 FLOOD LINE
CUT
FILL
RIPARIAN ZONE
VEGETATION LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
DESIGN CONTOURS
TREE TO BE RETAINED
LAYOUT PLAN
° 15 20
SCALE foe 4500 (A1)
: 7 , DRAWING NUMBER:
© corner SURVEYOR: CLIENT PROIET: ae ee aon Siaaehae PLANNING
DESIGNED:
SERS 2 DAVID LOW War, ee REPARTNERS 8531-B
Seyi of Te De KENLYNN PTY LTD RaW 38 Eee BULK EARTHWORKS FULL Seat
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 [DRIVEWAY REVISED nov'7 | RT Foeckep. PM —DW STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL LAYOUT PLAN 1 2] l l l l
Tee ere coe oa 1 [DRIVEWAY REVISED AND TURNAROUND ADDED | ocT ‘17 | SB Firm HGT)BED9 Seee FaN(O7}898 S659 OF DRAWh
"AMENDMENTS DATE [INTIALS| DATE: JUNE “17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 8
1.50
1.62
1.46
1.43
1.46
FL/
SIGN/
SIGN/
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N\ 500d \853I\ACAD\PLANNING\8531-C.dwg
PLOT DATE-> 06 Nov, 2017-4.40pm
LEGEND
DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY
Q100 FLOOD LINE
RIPARIAN ZONE
VEGETATION LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
DESIGN CONTOURS
-2.0m to -3.0m
-2.0m to -1.0m
-1.0m to 0.0m
0.0m to 1.0m
1.0m to 2.0m
LAYOUT PLAN
° 15 20
SCALE foe 4500 (A1)
: 7 , DRAWING NUMBER:
© corner SURVEYOR: CLIENT PROIET: ae ee aon Siaaehae PLANNING
DESIGNED:
SERS 2 DAVID LOW War, reas [cornu REPARTNERS 8531-C
Seyi of Te De KENLYNN PTY LTD RaW 38 Eee BULK EARTHWORKS GRADATION PULL SEAN
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 [DRIVEWAY REVISED nov'7 | RT Foeckep. PM —DW STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL LAYOUT PLAN 1 2] l l l l
Tee ere coe oa 1 [DRIVEWAY REVISED AND TURNAROUND ADDED | ocT ‘17 | SB Firm HGT)BED9 Seee FaN(O7}898 S659
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT. “AMENDMENTS DATE TINTIALS | DATE JUNE “17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 9
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
PLOT DATE-> 06 Nov, 2017-4:35pm CAD FILE->N:\8SOOdir\53I\ACAD\PLANNING\853-D.dwg
EASM
PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, a 5 a >
— a ® = 4 8 a a lz % 8
A -T— a q Ble 1 2 sj \3 {Lor 715] g ©
3 =| 7 SL iL i ee ee ae a
DATUM R.L.-6.000 DATUM R.L.-6.000 DATUM R.L.-6.000
CUT DEPTH (-ve) a . CUT DEPTH (-ve) CUT DEPTH (-vel . .
FILL DEPTH (+ve) Sis|s|5 = FILL DEPTH (+ve) zlzle FILL DEPTH (+ve) SiSlZE 2/5| ¢
DESIGN SURFACE ge|alz 2 DESIGN SURFACE alglg DESIGN SURFACE slelals als} 8
NATURAL SURFACE s|s slalalg|s e/s al 3 giz NATURAL SURFACE ele elalg|sle 5 z zig NATURAL SURFACE sis s|sigisis zis) 3 8] 3
PEGGED CHAINAGE alg elelg/s|2 2\§ 3) § alg PEGGED CHAINAGE alg 3|s|2/3/3 g g sig PEGGED CHAINAGE alg elalglalg alg} 8 3] 8
SECTION GQ) We Non SECTION Q) NATURAL SURFACE SECTION (4 \
Ce) LB) 2 wy
s 1 1 > > DESIGN SURFACE = &
pO a 8 [orm é lor75)] > 5 ‘ _
L PS 1 ‘| a 7 | |
DATUM R.L.-6.000
CUT DEPTH (-ve) e s +
FILL DEPTH (+ve) ¢ s|8 3} }s] = 2|2
DESIGN SURFACE z 5 g) slg] 8 a8
NATURAL SURFACE 2 g| 8 alg 2 z 3] gig] « alg 5 Z 2/8
PEGGED CHAINAGE 8 g 3) 3 g 3\8 g g a) £8) 2 ge g 5 ele
SECTION oe
CROSS SECTION
0 5 10m 4:250 VERTICAL (A1)
SCALES
0 5 10 15 20 25m 1:500 HORIZONTAL (A1)
© copyricit SURVEYOR CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN er Dae PLANNING DRAWING NUMBER:
Hemarmncng DAVID LOW WAY, moo ¢ | MP~ ARTNERS 8531-D
‘OF SHEEHY AND PARTNERS, 2 a CHECKED: PM CONSULT AUSTRALIA
COLIN DIENT W KENLYNN PTY LYD Rae 8 we ee BULK EARTHWORKS ruuL sem
varcecnant CASTAWAYS BEACH = rma mac tymesewss [wv Voc mn ae SITE SECTIONS TI
"AMENDMENTS DATE [INITIALS | DATE: JUNE ‘17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 10
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N-\8S00dir\ 853I\ ACAD\PLANNING\853-E.dwa
PLOT DATE-> 06 Nov, 2017-4:36pm
START OF CONSTRUCTION CH 0.000
IP CH.2.307 RL.21.223
IP CH.6.828 RL.20.318
IP CH.12,662 RL.20.173
FOOTPATH
CROSSING
DESIGN SURFACE
EXISTING SURFACE
3
2 a
5 4
a =
zs =
= = =
a = a
~ S Z
NK g z 2
s = =
a 5
~ — 7 3 RS
——— & eo
— a z2
35
mm $8
zs
va
2 6
1.0m 6.0m
CONSTRUCTION DETAIL DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
ve 4 C10,000m ¢|10.000m C 10,000 5.00
VERT. CURVE DETAILS R26{716m| 7.034m — |[R71.429m R433,961m R134.886m R52.83
~3loo0%4 -2.5¢0% [16.00% -2.000% 6.274% Li.e8e%| |—4.244%
GRADING DETAILS 0 400%
DATUM R.L.3,000 SSS885555
CUT DEPTH (-ve) holo
2/2 /e/z/2/s/8/S/e/3) & 2 Sia) 8 sls} S| a]s] s|sis
FILL DEPTH (+ve) sls|F]2/8/Slss|sfs] 3 sis| = s|s 3 s/s] s/s
LIP LEVELS RHS SisislSisRiSjeisis]s| 8 gle] 8 g 8) s]aix
A[AIN[S/S/8/8[F/2 [2] 5 5 ele| 8 S| sisie
A/BAS/E/B/SlmlSla] so 2 QS = R15 = Se] Says
LIP LEVELS LHS 8)8/3)5/5|/2)=|8)/3/8| § 5 SS} = 8/8) 8} = SIE] Sig]8
AIAN IR /R/R/S [Sle] Ss = ele & ee e #/s] siaie
DESIGN SURFACE RISIS/S/S/S/8|E/8/3| 8 3 3/8) 3 als| 3] B/S] S88
A/S/8/8/8/8/8|2/2 [2] = = ele}, = e/e 6 ale] aiale
NATURAL SURFACE gglgaalelesa|s| = ale} s| gig} 3] aidlalele
PEGGED CHAINAGE slgigisleleisisigei2] = 3/8) 8 g/@) a] Ele) ZI8]8
s/s[e|2|Fle/S/ 4/8/85] a = &i/S| & 3% & 2/2| 2/2|2
R-9.75m | __RASSm
CONTROL LINE DETAILS Bua Be] On Tain) | Be
LAYOUT-PLAN
SCALE 4100 VERTICAL(A1)
—
0 5 0 15 20. 25m 1500 HORIZONTAL (A1)
© wren SURVEYOR CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN PLANNING DRAWING NUMBER:
Peace Oe are 2 DAVID LOW WAY, OESEND _$B w~ 8531-E
Cope oF THE DOCENT N KENLYNN PTY LTD , CHECKED: PM__| CONSULT AUSTRALIA ai]
’ TY TiMiTes FULL SIZE AI
MITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 [DRIVEWAY REVISED nov‘? [RT ee = — i STRUCTURAL AND CM DRIVEWAY LONGITUDINAL SECTION 2] | LL J
APRINGEMENT oF COPYRIGHT 1 [DRIVEWAY REVISED AND TURNAROUND ADDED | oct'17| sp [TECKED: _PM Firm BHCOT)90B8 See Frn(07} 3830 3885
DATE: JUNE TT A.C.N.009 899 S05 Ne. OF DRAWINGS
AMENDMENTS DATE [INITIALS
Page 11
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N\8500dr\53I\ACAD\PLANNING\853)-H.dwg
PLOT DATE-> O7 Jul, 2017-9:58am
MANHOLE No.
MH TYPE & DROP
COVER TYPE
JUNCT. LINE No.
JUNCT. DROP TYPES
DEPTH TO HC
HC INVERT LEVEL
HC TYPE
HC LOT No.
CH FROM DS MH
MAINTENANCE HOLE TYPES: (SEQ-SEW-1300-1)
P1-P3 = PRE-CAST CONCRETE
A = 10006 CONCRETE
B = 1200@ CONCRETE
C = 15000 CONCRETE
HB/SR - HORIZONTAL BEND, SMALL RADIUS
HB/LR - HORIZONTAL BEND, LARGE RADIUS.
MAINTENANCE SHAFTS: (SEQ-SEW-1314-1 & 1314-2)
J = 225 uPVE
NOTE:
FOR MH DROP TYPES REFER SEQ-SEW-1303-1
FOR MS TYPE AND JUNCTIONS REFER
SEQ-SEW-1314-1 & 1314-2
3. FOR COVER TYPES REFER SEQ-SEW-1308-1
4, FOR HC TYPES AND DROPS REFER
SEQ-SEW-1104-1 & SEQ-SEQ-1105-1
t LOT CONTROL POINT
INVERT LEVEL OF HOUSE
DRAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
yO
®
<|> <> </> </> 9 a/> </> </> <|[>
© 2 o = 2 2 o =
> > > > > > > >
tlale 2 = 5
a/2)2) | S| 8 S
| co] oo < < <
=ls/e = 2 z
eel e 5 5 =
SIS} 3 3 3 3
DESIGN SURFACE
NATURAL SURFACE
Si] -
A
a |x
ee
/\
/
2, TRENCHSTOPS
4 TRENCHS TOP. Jo
2, TRENCHS TOPS
TRENCHS TOP
T
4 TRENCHS TOP|2, TRENCHS TOPS|
Se
PIPE DIA & TYPE 1500 uPVC CLASS SNB
PIPE GRADE (1 in x) rooooo | 7546 | 8083 | 9356 | 11531 | 15.061 | 11370 100.000 | _ 100,000
DATUM RL -9.000 0.000
JUNCTION
INVERT LEVEL
DEPTH FROM FSL ale siz ela sis le sls ele als sis 8
INVERT LEVEL 3s ele oglg gig zig als $I &fS 2lR 8
FINISHED SURFACE 3 3 3 R 2 8 = = z 8
NATURAL SURFACE 3 s 3 R 2 8 & = a R
PEGGED CHAINAGE $2500 fo 9.033 |r 26.598 | 30.415 |Z to.941 |B 26.035 |B 30.119 g 27353 |Rwan |®
LINE NUMBER 1
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
0 1 2 3 & 5m 1400 VERT. (41)
SCALES -—}-—+—+-_+ +
0 10 20 30 40 50m 11000 HORIZ. (At)
COPYRIGHT SURVEYOR CLIENT PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN ESS DRAWING NUMBER:
remem, 2 DAVID LOW WAY, vesoeo st | PN Sate PLANNING 8531-H
(OF SHEEHY AND PARTNERS. KENLYNN PTY LTD a CHECKED: PM CONSULT AUSTRALIA
WHOLE OR N PART WtWOUT CASTAWAYS BEACH DRAWN: SB CONSULTING ENGINEERS SEWER RETICULATION FULL SIZE At
IND PARTIERS CONSTITUTES AN CHECKED: PM vert STRUGTURAL AND LONGITUDINAL SECTION LILLLU
INFRINGEMENT OF COPTRIHT AMENDMENTS DATE [WTIALS| DATE JUNE "17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS
Page 12
1.50
·
·
·
· 1.46
1.62
1.43
1.46
FL/
SIGN/
SIGN/
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N\@500di\853I\ACAD\PLANNING\8531-J.dwg
PLOT DATE-> 10 Nov, 2017-6:5pm
LEGEND
NORM - DAY
MEAN - DAY
TRUCK - DAY (70kph)
SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE - NORTH
EDD-SISD 8.40%
85th % SPEED 70 80 EYE AND OBJECT HEIGHT
oT RT d | algrade) REQUIREMENTS (m)
MEAN SPEED 595 68
NORM DAY 15 2 046 | 8.40 109.9 1325 1.10 125
MEAN DAY 17 2 ont | 8.40 95.1 114.2 1.10 125
TRUCK DAY 15 2 029 8.40 Bbk 164.4 2.40 0.80
SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE - SOUTH
EDD-SISD ~4.10%
85th % SPEED 70 80 EYE AND OBJECT HEIGHT
or RT d | algrade) REQUIREMENTS (m)
MEAN SPEED 595 68
NORM DAY 15 2 0.46 8.40 110.0 132.6 1.10 1.25
MEAN DAY 7 2 out | 8.40 95.2 1143 1.10 125
TRUCK DAY 15 2 029 | 8.40 134.7 164.8 2.40 0.80
NOTE:
© THE LONGITUDINAL GRADE HAS BEEN MEASURED 100m FROM THE INTERSECTING ROAD,
WITH THE EXISTING RL'S AND THE AVERAGE GRADE FOR THE LENGTH UTILISED.
* MINOR ROAD - MEASURE FROM 5m (OR MIN. 3m) BACK FROM EDGE OF CARRIAGEWAY
© — MAJOR ROAD (NORTHERN APPROACH) - MEASURED ALONG CENTRE LINE OF SOUTHBOUND LANE.
© — MAJOR ROAD (SOUTHERN APPROACH) - MEASURED ALONG CENTRE LINE OF NORTHBOUND LANE.
— 110.967
LAYOUT PLAN
0 1 0
SCALE pee 1500 (A1)
SURVEYOR: CLIENT: PROJECT: “SCALES: AS SHO! DRAWING NUMBER:
Teena cocae ae See PLANNING
isan nore 2 DAVID LOW WAY, COKE. PM PARTNERS 8531-J
KENLYNN PTY LTD aa e acerba rests SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
SOLER N PART WITHOUT 3 [TRUCK #0km/h SIGHT LINE REMOVED Nov [RT Yorawn sb GONSULTING ENGINEERS FULL SIZE At
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 [DRIVEWAY REVISED Nov [RT 7 —DW STRUCTURAL AND_CIVIL LAYOUT PLAN 2/3] | | |
Tee ere coe oa 1 | TRUCK DAY SISD ADDED ocr | sep CHECKED Firm HGT)BED9 Seee FaN(O7}898 S659
"AMENDMENTS DATE | INITIALS | DATE: JUNE ‘17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 13
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->N-\8S00dir\ 8531\ ACAD\PLANNING\853-K.dwg
DESIGN SURFACE
PLOT DATE-> 10 Nov, 2017-5:I7pm
(PROPOSED DRIVEWAY) u e
ze
EXISITNG RETAINNG WALL TO
BE ADJUSTED
=
Sl-
we
we
STRIP EXISTING SURFACE. a
(70mm Approx.)
DESIGN SURFACE
(PROPOSED DRIVEWAY)
lL 128.059 133.217 |
NORMAL DAY - SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE NORMAL DAY - SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
(CAR 80KM/H NORTHERN APPROACH) (CAR 80KM/H SOUTHERN APPROACH)
0 05 10 15 2.0 2.5m 450 VERTICAL (A1) 0 05 1.0 15 2.0 2.5m 150 VERTICAL (A1)
SCALES SCALES
0 10 20 30 40 50m 1:500 HORIZONTAL (A1) @ 10 20 30 40 50m 1:500 HORIZONTAL (A1)
——— DATUMR L000
——— DATUM Ries 000
© crn ‘SURVEYOR CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN PLANNING DRAWING NUMBER:
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED W DESIGNED: SB , aN
spac Moras KENLYNN PTY LTD 2 DAVID LOW WAY, CHECKED: PM | CONSULT AUSTRALIA SISD - NORMAL DAY 8531-K
COPYING OF THI DOCUMENT
; FULL SIZE Al
MITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 |SIGHT LINES REVISED Nov'17 | RT ee = — i STRUTURAL OND ENE CAR LONGITUDINAL 1] 2] [ [ [ [
IPRNCENENT OF COPYRIGHT. 1 [DRIVEWAY REVISED Nov" 17|_ RT - Firm SECTIONS
AMENDMENTS DATE_[iniTiacs J DATE: JUNE ‘17 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 14
CONSULT AUSTRALIA Member Firm [OCR of page images] CAD FILE->N-\8S00dir\ 8531 ACAD\PLANNING\E53I-L.dwa PLOT DATE-> 10 Nov, 2017-5:19pm EYE HEIGHT (2.4m) arrnox aRDCENL NHL (DUTRAPCLATED POW SURVEN 134.400 DESIGN SURFACE (PROPOSED DRIVEWAY) NORMAL DAY - SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE (TRUCK 70KM/H NORTHERN APPROACH) 05 10 15 2.0 2.5m 1:50 VERTICAL (A1) TARGET (0.8m) EYE HEIGHT (2.4m) \ NATURAL SURFACE 134.700 NORMAL DAY - SAFE INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE (TRUCK 70KM/H SOUTHERN APPROACH) 05 10 15 2,0 2.5m 1:50 VERTICAL (A1) DESIGN SURFACE (PROPOSED DRIVEWAY) SCALES —— SCALES —— 0 10 20 30 40 50m 1:500 HORIZONTAL (A1) 0 10 20 30 40 50m 1:500 HORIZONTAL (A1) ——— PATUMRL 15000 —— DATUMRL S000 ee © crn ‘SURVEYOR CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN PLANNING DRAWING NUMBER: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED W DESIGNED: SB , aN ieee raters KENLYNN PTY LTD 2 DAVID LOW WAY, CHECKED: ——-PM__| CONSULT AUSTRALIA SISD - TRUCK - DAY 8531-L COPYING OF THI DOCUMENT DRAWN: SB FULL SIZE At MITTEN PERMISSION OF SHEEHY CASTAWAYS BEACH 2 |SIGHT LINES REVISED Nov't| RT Ponccgen. PM — i STRUTURAL OND ENE TRUCK LONGITUDINAL 1] 2] [ [ [ [ ERNCENENT OF COPYRIGHT 1 JDRIVEWWAY REVISED nove | RT - Firm Brqarese Sees Foo7)se 3888 SECTIONS AMENDMENTS DATE [INITIALS] DATE JUNE ‘17 5 A.C.N.009 899 905 No. OF DRAWINGS:
Page 15
CONSULT AUSTRALIA Member Firm [OCR of page images] CAD FILE->N:\8500dr\853!\ ACAD\PLANNING\853I-M.dwg PLOT DATE-> 2 Oct, 2017-I:37am ay ( | | DATUMRL. 20 CHAINAGE 60.000 jAPP Boy DATUM R.L. 19 CHAINAGE 120.000 RP BDY / / L woe to woe tr > CHAINAGE 40.000 > CHAINAGE 100.000 St S 3! 3 1’ oO S S SI S| 4 | a Qa ' a Tt a | | ; | | Gg _ ' | a | ~o Petunia tit | CHAINAGE 20.000 | CHAINAGE 100.000 ' ' | | ' ' | Jo ' ee ee | | ' t > | a | 5 ' ' ee to tt as ate tte CHAINAGE 0.000 CHAINAGE 80.000 CROSS SECTIONS scaue M8 at00 (at) verona nA “ee “Nt PROIRCT: ss 1s stow o~ TTT ae PLANNING DRAWING NOMBER: Feces” KENLYNN PTY LTD 2 DAVID LOW WAY, aicaca or conde aver auA DAVID LOW WAY 8531-M serine oi CASTAWAYS BEACH |” eTmucTunA. sno cv CROSS SECTIONS to INFRINGENENT OF COPYRIGHT DATE: UNE ‘17 Firm Ron 008 "300 008 SHEET 1 OF 2 No. OF DRAWINGS: AMENDMENTS DATE_| INITIALS ee INe
Page 16
CONSULT AUSTRALIA Member Firm [OCR of page images] CAD FILE->NA8500di'\853I\ACAD\PLANNING\853)-N.dwg PLOT DATE-> 2 Oct, 2017-I:38am CHAINAGE 200.000 CHAINAGE 280.000 poe gg ATM fo--n a2 -- 2222222 nooo 22 - sg p cos DATUM RL. 9 ot CHAINAGE 180.000 ! CHAINAGE 260.000 aI ei S| 3} a| = I ba Qa a S| SI . ti <u a | | @ No 2 . | —— | : : | ' ' oS Se | | ~o fo tatu rune CHAINAGE 160.000 CHAINAGE 240.000 ' t | | | | . | | ' | 4 a | a - | _ ee | ———— 4 Be _ | | ' ' ~o ee Joo ator Wee ot CHAINAGE 140.000 CHAINAGE 220.000 CROSS SECTIONS seas S28 0 tat © convaice SURVEYOR: CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES: AS SHOWN aay & PLANNING DRAWING NUMBER: ‘THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN DESIGNED: SB SS, ~. SrsHee ANOPARTNERS KENLYNN PTY LTD 2 DAVID Low WAY, CHECKED: PM CONSULT AUSTRALIA DAVID LOW WAY 8531-N witeareeren tac CASTAWAYS BEACH BRAWN __S® —DP esa Sores CROSS SECTIONS mse Serer ensrnc — Firm ac a lee SHEET 2 OF 2 PTT "AMENDMENTS: DATE [INITIALS | DATE: JUNE ‘17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No, OF DRAWINGS:
Page 17
CONSULT AUSTRALIA
Member Firm
[OCR of page images]
CAD FILE->NA\8500dF\853I\ACAD\PLANNING\8531-0.409
PLOT DATE-> I3 Nov, 2017-1'58pm
EXTEND PROPOSED EASEMENT
12.50
2.20 6.85
SU TRUCK
Width
Track
Lock to Lock Time
Steering Angle
© 2.50m
: 250m
+ 6.0s
: 36.6m
PROPOSED 3 PARKING BAYS
seace 5” 25 tan
scale Lo
1:125 (A1)
PRELIMINARY
‘SURVEYOR: CLIENT: PROJECT: SCALES) AS SHO DRAWING NUMBER:
Oe coca aa SHEEHY & PLANNING
eee” 2 DAVID LOW WAY, crEHED. PH | conguLr AUSTRALIA SAG 8531-0
Cor ce KENLYNN PTY LTD oman 8 DRIVEWAY ACCESS TRUCK SWEPT PULL sie at
tren Penn oF SHY CASTAWAYS BEACH ona _$2 i CONSULTING ENGINEERS PATH eo
BRRCnN oF rv 1 [SWEPT PATH REVISED PER COUNCIL COMMENTS | NOV‘17| RT * Firm ‘PH(O7) 3638 3644 FAN(O7]SEI9 3655
"AMENDMENTS. DATE _|INITIALS f DATE: JUNE ‘17 A.C.N.009 899 905 No, OF DRAWINGS: