Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

ATTCH 7 - IR Response - Engineering (Sheehy & Partners)

Attached to the e-mail RAL17/0501 IR Response email 4 of 4.

of 17

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (10.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                                                           four (4)


13,




Refer to Drawings 8531 - J, 8531 - K and 8531 - L below.


[OCR of page images]
 

A.C.N. 009 899 905
A.B.N. 52 009 899 905

DIRECTORS:

S. Thomas,
B.Eng:(Hons), M.I.E.Aust.

S. McDonald,
B.Eng. (Hons), M.1.E.Aust.
MBA

B. Mortimore,

B.Sc, MICE, F.l.E.Aust.
a

a

ms Gregory Terrace
SPRING HILL QLD 4000
Phone: (07) 3839 3644

Facsimile: (07) 3839 3655 ©

Email: [email protected]

8531

Attention: Lisa Pienaar
Noosa Council

PO Box 141

Tewantin Qld 4565

Response to Information Request
Planning Act 2016

RAL17/0501 - Lot 71 MCH 2854, 2 David Low Way Castaways Beach
Qld 4567

Sheehy & Partners Pty Ltd has been engaged to respond to four (4) specific
civil design issues raised in the Noosa Council request for information dated
the 7th of September 2017. The issues addressed here are those numbered
13, 14, 15 and 16 in the RFI.

Issue - Site access and traffic

Information Required

13. Assess and achieve Safe Intersection Sight Distance
requirements at the proposed driveway as defined by the
Austroads guidelines, consistent with the requirements of Section
3.10 of PSP5, based on the design speed of David Low Way
determined from a speed survey.

Response:

Refer to Drawings 8531 - J, 8531 - K and 8531 - L below.

Information Required

14. Modify the proposed site access design so that a HRV can turn
into the site from wholly within the proposed BAL left turn lane,
without using the adjacent through lane, so that the vehicle can
wait in that lane clear of through traffic, if there is another vehicle
waiting to depart from the access at that same time. Otherwise
the site access should be redesigned to accommodate turning to
the access by a HRV at the same time as a car is departing the
site. Also, the taper for the proposed BAL treatment needs to be
lengthened to comply with Austroads standards.

Response:

The site access has been modified to accommodate the design vehicle (HRV)
turning wholly within the BAL left turn lane.

8/11/2017 1|Page
Log in to download the original file

ATTCH 7 - IR Response - Engineering (Sheehy & Partners).pdf · 10.2 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.