Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v4 - 7 Triller Court, Pomona

 

 

 

Sub Unit 1 - siope assessed as 1 degree due to Sub Unit being located uplsope or across slope relevant to the development area.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

  

 

   
  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Combined ;
Maximum | Potential P ial
Vegetation Hazard Class cerateerd Total Fuel cranes Landscape] Fireline
Near Severity Bushfire
surface Fuel|‘028'/P9)) (een) | Slope | Intensity! ensitys
Load (t/ha) "| (degrees) | (kw/m)
VHC 9.1 - Moist to dry
eucalypt open forests on
“| ana 21 24.2 47 1 15,866 | Medium
ranges:
Sub Unit 2
(Firetine intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Combined ;
Maximum | Potential
Vegetation Hazard Class | SY¥9%° 9" | rotat ruet | "© WES" Landscape Fireline | Poventia!
Near Severity = Bushfire
# Load (t/ha) Slope | Intensity :
Surface Fuel (FFDI) « Intensity*|
ined (t/ha) (degrees) | (kw/m)
VHC 9.1 - Moist to dry
eucalypt open forests on 45 5 a7 7 _ 24,004
[coastal lowland and
Sub Unit 3
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)
Combined
Maximum | Potential
Vegetation Hazard Class | M9094 | rotat euell| TS es? tancscape| Firaline:| Cree
Near Severity Bushfire.
# Load (t/ha) Slope | Intensity
Surface Fuel /(FFOI) z Intensity*
toad (t/ha) (degrees) | (kw/m)
VHC 9.1 - Moist to dry
eucalypt open forests on B , i , :
pera a 24.2 47 9 27,556
fe
Sub Unit 4
(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting woodland as the relevant vegetation type)
‘Combined ;
Maximum | Potential
. Negatetion Hazard class | shteee are lpeatruet | (heen ltandscapel lensing | eon
Near ys i Severity | Bushfire
# % Load (t/ha)} Slope | Intensity)
2 Surface Fuel (FFD!) ' Intensity*
& 3 Load (t/ha) (degrees) | (kw/m)
3 m } VHC 40.4- Continuous
z 3 3 homies ot as cee 45 5 47 9 1220 | tow
me Soo.
OP ~ £99 ais Rue Sub Unit 5
Pe oe io “S&B (Firetine intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting woodland as the relevant vegetation type)
) %, 8
\ ; og Ih jf = Combined Maxi
3 G08 ! oT AS IN = Surface and Fire Weather| im | Potential! potential
Vegetation Hazard Class Total Fuel Landscape} Fireline
015 30 4 60 75 150 # Bees Load (t/ha) Severity, Slope | Intensity! Eashira
LEGEND re ne (FF) | (degrees) | (hw/m) |'™*"5¥"
Load (t/ha) :
Ty" SITE VHC 41.4- Discontinuous 25 3 47 9 406 Low.
low grass or tree cover

 

 

 

 

150m ASSESSMENT BUFFER # From: Leonard, J., & Opie, K,, (2017) Estimating the potential bushfire hazard of vegetation patches and

corridors ~ an enhancement of Queensiand’s methodology for State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas.
CSIRO, Australia.

 

 

LOW POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

* From: Leonard, 1., Newnham, G., Opie, K, and Bianchi, R. (2014) Anew methodology for state-wide mapping of
bushfire prone areas in Queensiand, CSIRO, Australia

 

 

 

 

MEDIUM POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

{ ] HIGH POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Coast

 

 

 

Environmental Po Box este Facite Paradeo. ou asee | BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT MARK OLIVE SUB UNITS J000841 BFO2 A
Sa, meee 17 TRILLER COURT POMONA sa SO) coreeraneeartrenortu tone gumemromserrom cna a ee aes