Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 FEBRUARY 2020
Summary of Matters Raised Comments
‘will impact the authenticity of the experience Several other structures are able to be viewed from
that tourists travelling to our shire seek to tourist locations. The tower is not visible from James
receive’ McKane Lookout. The view from the Noosa Trails
network has been assessed as having minor/
negligible visual impact.
Location of the tower is detrimental to the Noosa The site is located in the Regional Landscape and
biosphere and UNESCO’s principles. Rural Production Area (RLRPA) as identified in the
‘The purpose for wanting to live and invest in this SEQ Regional Plan. The intent of RLRPA is:
area is for the highly sought after rural scenic protect the values of this land from
amenity this area offers. It is unique in its natural encroachment by urban and rural residential
heritage with spectacular rural views taking in all development; and
the volcanic plugs of the Noosa Hinterland. protect natural assets and regional
Something Council should protect and value as landscapes, and ensure their sustainable use
an asset to the greater Noosa Shire.’ and management
In this regard, a NBN tower in this location could be
seen to not meet this intent. Appropriate
development in the RLRPA includes activities that
are associated with primary production, land
management, some tourism activity, and
community and recreation activity.
Strategies outlined in Element 6: Digital
infrastructure in the SEQ Regional Plan support
improvement in digital infrastructure.
The SEQ Regional Plan recognises Noosa
Biosphere Reserve and the value of Noosa’s
natural landscapes
The SEQ Regional Plan is intended to be applied
giving appropriate weight to all themes, goals,
elements and strategies to deliver a balanced
approach to planning and development throughout
the life of the plan. One element cannot be
excluded or given undue bias without due
consideration of the overall outcome sought.
The height of existing trees at the sites location The applicant has chosen to reduce the height of the
are 12 metres, and the tower 36 metres. Towers tower by 10 metres.
approximately 24 metres over existing The latest survey plan provided by the applicant
vegetation. seeks to remove 8 mature trees and 4 smaller trees.
Clearing vegetation for the tower will decrease These are predominantly contained within the tower
efficiency of vegetation screening and leave a compound as the most recent change to the plan
scar on the land. The construction of the tower alters the alignment of the proposed access to
will have impacts on fauna. coincide with the existing site access, deviating
close to the compound some 60m in from the site
The proposal relies upon mature vegetation to
access.
create a visual barrier… The trees appear to be
mature with limited life span and have been Trees around the tower site will be retained.
subject to wind and fire damage in the past; Species likely to be impacted upon to facilitate the
therefore we believe they should not be used as tower include Acacia’s, immature camphor laurels,
a visual buffer to tower. …Dominant regrowth lantana and one immature Hard Quandong (2m
has a height of only 5-10m. high).
Tower will be seen either side of the drive entry Agreed. The top of the tower will be visible at this
to 244 and the first corner after the bridge location.
coming up to Tablelands Rd. Generally
prominent along the road within 300m of the
tower.
Page 29 of 119
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.