Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-11 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 11 FEBRUARY 2020
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES OF PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS ON THE
DRAFT NOOSA BIOSECURITY PLAN 2020
Subject Submitter’s comments Officer’s comments
Species categorised for prevention, Supportive of species identified for prevention, eradication and Species list has been adjusted accordingly
eradication and containment containment with some minor changes
Methods of control More information required of the costs/benefits of each More information included
method required
Biosecurity survey methodology Further clarification of survey frequency needed and stronger Amended
correlation with the Action Plan required
Objectives and targets Integrate objective and targets rather than just outputs Environment Strategy objectives and targets have been
integrated into the Plan
Mapping Improvements to cartography Maps amended
Use of glyphosate Submitter supports the use of Glyphosate and considers it Noted
effective and safe
Dingoes Dingoes do not attack domestic animals and do not transmit All animals have the potential to transmit disease. Alternative
disease and parasites. Domestic animals transmit disease to methods are already employed in some sectors in the shire
other animals and humans. Alternative methods to lethal where appropriate. Biosecurity controls follow industry best
control should be employed such as electric fencing, guardian practice and standards. There is uncertainty as to the scientific
animals and changes to animal husbandry. Any harm to classification of dingoes. Council is guided by Biosecurity
dingoes and other animals should be subject ethical and Queensland and scientific experts as to its nomenclature.
empirical standards and should be only at a last resort.
Submitter disagrees with the current classification of dingo as
Canus lupus dingo, being a sub species of domestic dog, and
should be classified a separate species.
Page 73 of 119
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.