Council archive · source document
001AD296.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checkiist, Version 22
PA GST . . : 4
41 Is the proposed operational work assessable under any State planning regulatory provisions?
{J No [] Yes
If no, is the proposed operational work assessable under the planning scheme?
[LJ No - Goto 04.2 EX] Yes - Complete Form 1, Part £ and answer 04.1 1 - 4.1.7 below
rATCCCNTRG ORGAO ; TF
4.14 Isany part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?
INo [] Yes
If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998,
schedule 5 and does it exceed the threshold?
No - Goto Q4.1.2
Cc Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Reyiot on, sched. 2. table 3, tem 3 IP Regisston schedule 2, table 3 tem T{b)
ee A RS RR RTS I AS, peering
® WOT OTE SES
prow St a tt LT TTT IS
4.1.2 \sany of the operational work proposed in a local government area listed*" in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing
Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils
K] No -Gotoa4.1.3 (| Yes
4.1 aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Cabooture, Cains, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Iss, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine Rivers,
Reddiiffe, Redand, Rockhampton, Sanna, Thunngowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday
IP Reguiation, scheduie 2, table 3. lem 4: Slate Planning Policy 292° Planing and Managing Development inveiing Acid Sutate Sails sectar 36
a = A AT STR pg EL lt A A NS I mee
EASES TISiS AP; SUBS 14 TOMS }
ee eR ee EE RIF mT I TOA TY
413 Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
No -GotoQ4.1.4
[_] Yes
IP Reguiation, schedule 2, tob’e 3 item 10{a). [P Reguiztion, schedute 2 table 3. dem 10{d}
4.1.4 \s any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of the holder of Pipeline Licence Number 1 issued under the
Petroleum Act 1923 for the construction or operation of the Moonie to Brisbane strategic pipeline under that Act?
®@ Dx] No -Gotoa4.15 [_] Yes
IP Regutaton schedule 2, table 3, tem 17
Pay, PATI RAR OOK: . Te - ~
Bn tte, RNR RA RN ARTS > pm RE a
4.1.5 Is any of the proposed operational work fisted in schedule 13C of the integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
No-Gotoa4.16 [_) Yes - This application must be referred to QueenslandTransport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2. tabie 3, tem 14
Read vst shabi ad a OEP RELY . | _ os
Da TTI | * EL
41.6 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13D of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
No-Goto04.1.2 — [_] Yes - This application must be referred to QueensiandTranspont (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
IP Reguiztion schedule 2, table 3 fem 15
Rost TRE Re Od) ap a, SEG Ib, mnt » — ee ee
417 |sany part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area, other than in an SEQ urban footprint area?
BX] No -Gotoas2 (_] Yes
IP Requiztar, scheduie 2 table 3 tem 9See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001AD296.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
09/0730 - Operational Works - (Jetty) [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.