PR102995-10_Minor Change

Our ref: PR102995-10

•      A request to extend the currency period was lodged to Noosa Council (REC14/0005.04) in June 2024 to
       extend the currency period to September 2029 to align with the currency period of MCU22/0051. This
       request is currently under assessment by Council.
Through the course of assessment of REC14/0005.04, Noosa Council have requested that a Minor Change
be lodged against REC14/0005.02 & REC14/0005.03 to align conditions of this approval with those within
the MCU approval for Hardware and trade supplies (MCU22/0051) which is approved over the subject site.
Noosa Council have confirmed that support for REC14/0005.04 can be provided subject to lodgement of this
Minor Change request.

1.2       Overview
The purpose of this Minor Change request is to amend particular conditions of approval for REC14/0005.02
and REC140005.03 to align with MCU22/0051 approved over Proposed Lot 103. Specific conditions to be
amended are detailed within Section 4.2 of this report, however the general intention is to amend conditions
pertaining to:
•      Land dedications along Gateway Drive.
•      Road, cyclist, and pedestrian infrastructure upgrades within the site frontage to Gateway Drive.
•      Stormwater and overland flow management from adjoining upstream properties to the east.
•      Consequential requirements for easements associated with stormwater infrastructure.

2         Minor Change Status
The proposed change to the development approval is consistent with the definition of a ‘minor change’ under
the Planning Act 2016 as outlined below:

2.1       Minor change definition

Under Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016, a minor                       Response
change (for a development approval) means a change
that:
      would not result in substantially different development;           Demonstration that the change does not constitute
      and                                                                substantially difference development is provided section
                                                                         2.2 below.
      if a development application for the development,
      including the change, were made when the change
      application is made would not cause
            the inclusion of prohibited development in the               The proposed changes do not result in the inclusion of
            application; or                                              prohibited development.
            referral to a referral agency, other than to the    The proposed change does not require a referral to a
            chief executive, if there were no referral agencies referral agency, other than the chief executive.
            for the development application; or
            referral to extra referral agencies, other than to           The original approval did not require referral to any referral
            the chief executive; or                                      agencies, other than the chief executive.
            a referral agency, in assessing the application              The original approval did not require referral to any referral
            under section 55, to assess the application                  agencies.
            against, or have regard to, a matter, other than a
            matter the referral agency must have assessed
            the application against, or had regard to, when
            the application was made; or
            public notification if public notification was not           The original application was Code Assessable. The
            required for the development application.                    proposed change does not trigger the need for public
                                                                         notification.




RPS AAP Consulting Pty Ltd. Registered in Australia No. 97 117 883 173
rpsgroup.com                                                                                                                     Page 2