PR102995-10_Minor Change

Our ref: PR102995-10

2.2       Substantially different development criteria

Under Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment                           Response
rules, a change may be considered to result in
substantially different development if any of the
following apply to the change:
(a) involves a new use;                                                  The change does not involve a new use.
(b) results in the application applying to a new parcel of               The change does not result in the application applying to a
    land; or                                                             new parcel of land.
(c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale,               The proposed change retains the approved allotment
    bulk and appearance; or                                              layout, and thus does not result in a dramatic change in
                                                                         terms of scale, bulk or appearance.
(d) changes the ability of the proposed development to                   The changes align the approval with subsequent approved
    operate as intended; or                                              land uses over the metes and bounds of Proposed Lot
                                                                         103, allowing the approved allotment layout to service its
                                                                         ultimate intended use. The proposed change therefore
                                                                         allows the development to operate as intended.
(e) removes a component that is integral to the operation                The proposed change does not remove a component that
    of the development; or                                               is integral to the operation of the development. The
                                                                         change introduces new components which allow the
                                                                         approved allotment layout to service its ultimate intended
                                                                         use
(f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport              The approved allotment layout is retained, and thus no
    network, such as increasing traffic to the site; or                  additional traffic flow will be introduced. Notably, the
                                                                         change introduces conditions pertaining to the upgrade of
                                                                         Gateway Drive, improving the function of the road network.
(g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of                   The proposed change does not introduce any new impacts
    known impacts; or                                                    or increase the severity of known impacts. The change
                                                                         provides additional conditions to manage anticipated
                                                                         impacts from future intended approved uses within
                                                                         Proposed Lot 103.
(h) removes an incentive or offset component that would                  The proposed change does not remove an incentive or
    have balanced a negative impact of the development;                  offset component that would have balanced a negative
    or                                                                   impact of the development.
(i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.                                The proposed change does not impact infrastructure
                                                                         provisions. No additional lots are proposed, and existing
                                                                         upstream catchment flows will continue to be captured and
                                                                         directed to a lawful point of discharge.


3         Referral agencies
As determined by Schedule 9 and 10 of the Planning Regulation 2017, the application does not require
referral to the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA). No referral agencies were triggered by the
original application, nor as a result of the change to the application.

4         Amendments to the approval
4.1       Approved drawings and documents
The proposed changes pertain only to the conditions of approval. The approved plan within the following
table will remain the approved document.
Plan No.                Rev.                  Plan/Document Name                                                      Date
102996-151              A                     Proposed Subdivision over Lot 101 on SP279285                           16 Sept 2020




RPS AAP Consulting Pty Ltd. Registered in Australia No. 97 117 883 173
rpsgroup.com                                                                                                                  Page 3