Council archive · source document
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0197 [As Published] · MCU22/0197
Setbacks
Rear Setback
Acceptable Outcome AO12.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires a minimum
rear setback of 6 metres. The proposal includes a rear setback of 4.2 metres to the outermost
projection of unit 1 and 4.8 metres to the main wall line and as such does not comply with the AO.
PO12
Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:
a) provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
including provision of visual and acoustic privacy;
b) not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable
areas of adjoining premises;
c) provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
d) preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
e) allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including adequate
area at ground level for landscaping with trees, shrubs, outdoor living and utilities;
f) be consistent with the predominant character of the surrounding area; and
g) protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important
areas such as national parks, waterways and wetlands.
The proposed rear setback is considered to comply with PO12 as it will not unreasonably obstruct
views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable rooms of adjoining properties and
will provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site. The proposed setback is also
considered to be consistent with the predominant character of the surrounding area, with similar
rear setbacks in the area. The duplex currently being constructed on the adjoining property at 75
Southern Cross Parade was approved with a rear setback of 4.8 metres and Council’s aerial
mapping shows the duplex at 71 Southern Cross Parade has a rear setback of approximately 4.1
metres.
Garage Doors
Acceptable Outcome AO15.2 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires that ‘where
multiple garages face the street, they are separated by a minimum of 2 metres or are staggered in
setback by a minimum of 1 metre’.
The proposed garage doors do not comply with AO15.2 as the garage doors are not staggered in
setback and are only separated 1 metre.
PO15
Garages, garage doors and carports do not dominate the street or the building design.
The proposal is considered to comply with PO15 as the garages are well setback from the front of
the property (8.5 metres) and the design of the units are well articulated to provide visual interest
to the street. The proposal also includes landscaping within the front setback to help buffer the
development from the street.
To further articulate and break up the design of the units and garage doors, it is considered
appropriate to include plan amendments to require the incorporation of a mix of building materials
to the front balustrade to further articulate and break up the front façade design.
Cut & Fill
Acceptable Outcome AO22.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires a maximum
cut and fill of 1.5 metres in depth. The proposal includes cut and fill exceeding 1.5 metres in the
private open space areas of unit 1 and part of unit 2 to provide a more level building pad and
therefore does not comply with the AO.
Page 9 of 25
Document Set ID: 22435587
Version: 8, Version Date: 15/06/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU22 0197 [As Published].pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.6 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.