Info Request MCU16/0153

                                                                                                         MCU16/0153



                  Information Required

                       39. Plans which detail the amount of solar access provided to north facing windows of
                           the upper and lower levels and open spaces areas of House Type 3 – this should
                           include shadow diagrams and that provide detail of the amount of hours of solar
                           access that these windows and open space areas will receive.

                  Issue – Elevations for House Type 3 (SD13)
                  Drawing SD13 House Type 3 Section Analysis identifies varying roof forms and floor
                  layouts which are not depicted in the floor and elevation plans.

                  Information required

                       40. Floor and elevation plans for House Type 3 that accurately depict proposed building
                           styles for this house type.

                  Issue - Earthworks
                  The extent of earthworks proposed appears to be excessive and unnecessary. It is also
                  noted that the submitted services report suggests that the batter on the western boundary
                  should extend into the adjacent Reserve area.

                  Information required

                       41. Provide additional comment on:

                                 a. the need for the proposed filling of the site and it’s impacts on the adjoining
                                    properties, and

                                 b. a proposed retaining system (batters, walls and other structures) that is
                                    wholly contained within the subject site


                  Furthermore it is important to reiterate the written advice to the pre-lodgement meeting held
                  on 14 December 2016:

                            The Open Space Recreation zone in Peregian Beach specifically seeks to protect
                            and retain the site for low cost visitor accommodation needs reflective of the site’s
                            previous use as a caravan park, but also acknowledges that a range of visitor
                            accommodation may be provided where integrated with budget accommodation.
                            There is no support given to permanent residents on the site.

                            It is noted that the current approval included only visitor accommodation, with no
                            permanent resident accommodation proposed. This approved development was
                            supported by Council through an appeal process as it was acknowledged that it
                            included low to mid cost visitor accommodation being a reasonable alternative to the
                            Planning Scheme’s intent to retain the caravan park.

                            It is considered the current proposal does not meet the Planning Scheme’s intent for
                            the site as there is a lack of and a limited range of visitor accommodation
                            proposed…….




                                                                                                       Page 11 of 13


Document Set ID: 20272939
Version: 3, Version Date: 10/02/2017